|
Zack M. Davis
@
zackmdavis
Berkeley, CA
|
|
programmer and epistemology groupie; @rustlang compiler team contributor
|
|
|
2.406
Tweetovi
|
1.240
Pratim
|
295
Osobe koje vas prate
|
| Tweetovi |
| Zack M. Davis proslijedio/la je tweet | ||
|
Analysis Fact
@AnalysisFact
|
8 h |
|
The derivative of an even function is an odd function.
|
||
|
|
||
| Zack M. Davis proslijedio/la je tweet | ||
|
QC
@QiaochuYuan
|
6 h |
|
"oversharing"? oh, i prefer to call it "speedrunning friendship"
"alright, this next trick is called Small Talk skip. it turns out if your Courage stat is high enough you can just skip the Small Talk section. straight into Talk About Feelings or even Sharing Childhood Traumas"
|
||
|
|
||
|
Zack M. Davis
@zackmdavis
|
6 h |
|
|
||
|
Zack M. Davis
@zackmdavis
|
6 h |
|
and the REALLY ambitious project is to get not-lying AND non-authoritarianism twitter.com/wolftivy/statu…
|
||
|
|
||
|
Zack M. Davis
@zackmdavis
|
7 h |
|
native speakers don't notice ANYTHING
|
||
|
|
||
|
Zack M. Davis
@zackmdavis
|
7 h |
|
it gets worse; if you thought conflating subject and object was bad, what about conflating object and possessive? (chart from medium.com/@robert.munro/… by @wwrob) pic.twitter.com/mGTnxJII1X
|
||
|
|
||
|
Zack M. Davis
@zackmdavis
|
24 h |
|
smart Boltzmann brain
|
||
|
|
||
|
Zack M. Davis
@zackmdavis
|
24 h |
|
smart play; the central "rationalists" are in a very sorry state these days
|
||
|
|
||
| Zack M. Davis proslijedio/la je tweet | ||
|
Wolf Tivy
@wolftivy
|
4. velj |
|
People keep saying that our culture is pro-individual, that if it deconstructs all social structure and meaning, at least you'll be a strong, healthy, and free specimen. But that's not true: it seems to deconstruct individual coherence too.
|
||
|
|
||
| Zack M. Davis proslijedio/la je tweet | ||
|
Analysis Fact
@AnalysisFact
|
4. velj |
|
The derivative of an odd function is an even function.
|
||
|
|
||
|
Zack M. Davis
@zackmdavis
|
4. velj |
|
"We hope that you, instead of hoping to influence us by saying that you have done us no wrong, will aim at what is feasible, holding in view the real sentiments of us both; since you know as well as we do that right, as the world goes, is only in question between equals in power"
|
||
|
|
||
| Zack M. Davis proslijedio/la je tweet | ||
|
Jessica Taylor
@jessi_cata
|
4. velj |
|
Conflict theories easily prey on mistake theories, as mistake theories cannot acknowledge that predation is taking place. To win in conflicts, then, mistake theories must ally with covert conflict theories, which may, for example, claim to be acting for the good of their victims.
|
||
|
|
||
|
Zack M. Davis
@zackmdavis
|
4. velj |
|
Especially when the villains don't even keep up their end of the bargain!?!
|
||
|
|
||
|
Zack M. Davis
@zackmdavis
|
4. velj |
|
Why do cartoon heroes always give in to extortion?! That's what villains the incentive to threaten in the first place! en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dane-geld… #RapunzelsTangledAdventure
|
||
|
|
||
|
Zack M. Davis
@zackmdavis
|
4. velj |
|
"The blue hair. What's going on there?" Eugene asks what everyone was thinking #RapunzelsTangledAdventure
|
||
|
|
||
|
Zack M. Davis
@zackmdavis
|
4. velj |
|
Calliope's smirk at 12:32 of "Race to the Spire" is VERY suspicious in a way that makes me wonder what Anton Chekhov (of en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chekhov%2… fame) would have made of that first scene with the cloak #RapunzelsTangledAdventure @SeriesTangled
|
||
|
|
||
|
Zack M. Davis
@zackmdavis
|
4. velj |
|
average utility is what an attempted replication of this poll would find with a better sampling methodology than "Roko's Twitter followers"
|
||
|
|
||
| Zack M. Davis proslijedio/la je tweet | ||
|
Nicholas Nethercote
@nnethercote
|
3. velj |
|
I carefully break my PR up into multiple commits, and write a careful commit message for each one, and then GitHub's "Files changed" tab hides all of that.
|
||
|
|
||
|
Zack M. Davis
@zackmdavis
|
3. velj |
|
If haters successfully impose costs on their target in a way that changes the target's behavior—for example, by getting the target to strategically self-censor (Graham: paulgraham.com/say.html)—then, evolutionarily speaking, their anger is functioning as designed. 3/3
|
||
|
|
||
|
Zack M. Davis
@zackmdavis
|
3. velj |
|
The evolutionary function of "anger" as a cognitive program is as a threat: a credible signal of intent to inflict costs on the target of the anger conditional on their behavior. (Sell, Tooby, and Cosmides: cep.ucsb.edu/papers/angerse…) 2/3
|
||
|
|
||