|
@worrydream | |||||
|
understanding engelbart pic.twitter.com/eN5oPGxUjy
|
||||||
|
||||||
|
Iian Neill (The Codex)
@codexeditor
|
17. tra |
|
This sounds like a Modernist revisionist approach to the Old Masters. In what sense was da Vinci _diametrically_ opposed to Verrocchio? Or Raphael to Perugino? Or Titian to Giorgione? They extended their work & deepened it & modified their course over time.
|
||
|
|
||
|
Iian Neill (The Codex)
@codexeditor
|
17. tra |
|
The problem is that only a certain level of creativity can be communicated from master to student. In many cases, the genius of the master is an impediment in that it overwhelms the student. We can't all be Michelangelo.
|
||
|
|
||
|
Ian Hall
@inhll
|
17. tra |
|
@99piorg just did an episode on Froebel’s Gifts (you’re probs already aware of em) and how they may have been a key aspect of unlocking some very creative thinking (Klee, etc). Interesting linkup!
overcast.fm/+DDaqA6A
|
||
|
|
||
|
Duppy
@duppy
|
17. tra |
|
And how froebel's gifts only existed for a short period and were replaced by a much simpler subset.
|
||
|
|
||
|
Mike Townsend
@michaeltheleo
|
17. tra |
|
What book is this?
|
||
|
|
||
|
Jimmy Miller
@jimmyhmiller
|
4. kol |
|
|
||
|
Paul Cantrell
@inthehands
|
17. tra |
|
…and Kay, and Atkinson
|
||
|
|
||
|
Christopher G
@galtenberg
|
17. tra |
|
cc @sociologicaleye - network difference in art vs. thought?
|
||
|
|
||
|
Bradford Larsen
@bradlarsen
|
17. tra |
|
“understanding_engelbart” sounds like the name of a docker container
|
||
|
|
||
|
Christopher Coleman
@mellowfish
|
17. tra |
|
Somewhat related: the documentary “Tim’s Vermeer” was excellent.
|
||
|
|
||