|
@wapodavenport | |||||
|
The Washington Post editorial board weighs in on the House’s NASA bill, saying the “shifting whims are the greatest threat to a space program constantly afflicted by whiplash.” washingtonpost.com/opinions/nasa-…
|
||||||
|
||||||
|
Stephen C. Smith
@WordsmithFL
|
1. velj |
|
Must be a slow news week for the WaPo editorial board to weigh in on space policy. 😉
|
||
|
|
||
|
Christian Davenport
@wapodavenport
|
1. velj |
|
Yeah, you’re right; there’s nothing else going on in Washington these days. 😀
|
||
|
|
||
|
David S. F. Portree aka DSFP
@dsfpspacefl1ght
|
1. velj |
|
I can't read the piece - paywall. It's significant that the WaPo ed board is commenting on this, however.
|
||
|
|
||
|
Greg Autry 😷🚀👨🏻🚀👩🚀🇺🇸
@GregWAutry
|
1. velj |
|
Thank you. Stay the course and give Loverro a chance to get things settled and moving.
|
||
|
|
||
|
jeff connolly
@connollyjeff1
|
2. velj |
|
Thats all Shelby this time around
|
||
|
|
||
|
Lori Garver
@Lori_Garver
|
2. velj |
|
Agreed! And the reason they shift is that they are whims! Apollo wasn’t a whim - it had a National purpose. When we have a program that aligns with a national purpose again, it won’t be a political whim & we will have the sustained support to accomplish something meaningful.
|
||
|
|
||