Twitter | Pretraživanje | |
Cody Bingham
Be more kind my friends, try to be more kind Humanist • Support your local artists
1.579
Tweetovi
359
Pratim
162
Osobe koje vas prate
Tweetovi
Cody Bingham proslijedio/la je tweet
Andrew Yang🧢 3 h
If Democrats argue for trust in government it’s incumbent on us to build and provide reasons for that trust.
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
Cody Bingham proslijedio/la je tweet
Inga Jeffrey🧢🧚🏿‍♀️🇹🇹 14 h
Nobody better say shit about voting blue no matter who.
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
Cody Bingham 12 h
What an absolute dumpster fire
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
Cody Bingham proslijedio/la je tweet
Tom Wright 16 h
CNN now reporting 2nd alignment was done wrong in some precincts. If true, sounds like there may never be complete results from Iowa.
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
Cody Bingham proslijedio/la je tweet
Andrew Yang's Hologram 🧢🖖 15 h
I just had a slight epiphany. If you live in Iowa, the precincts that would be figuring out your lot in life and handing you a "guaranteed federal job" that your community "needs" ... are the same people that can't figure out 15% in this caucus. Exact same people.
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
Cody Bingham 18 h
Odgovor korisniku/ci @koneyislands @BobDobbz42 i 5 ostali
I'm confused why you're saying "your president" as if he's a Trump supporter, when he's a Sanders supporter
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
Cody Bingham 19 h
Odgovor korisniku/ci @koneyislands @TonyGamboneOK i 5 ostali
You really talking about this guy? Whose profile pic has the mask of a little known guy called Batman? ...
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
Cody Bingham 19 h
Odgovor korisniku/ci @BobDobbz42 @TonyGamboneOK i 4 ostali
And the FD is a greater benefit to the majority on SSI and SNAP, along with being unconditional, not having to reapply or deal with any extra bureaucracy or paperwork, or having a chance to randomly fluctuate down. Also many who were eligible for SNAP don't receive it, unlike FD.
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
Cody Bingham 19 h
Odgovor korisniku/ci @BobDobbz42 @TonyGamboneOK i 4 ostali
Can you point me to where Yang says he would make you (and those in your position) give up your entire income? And I mean a 1st party source, direct written policy or video. Not some "I heard him say it somewhere"
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
Cody Bingham 19 h
Odgovor korisniku/ci @TonyGamboneOK @BobDobbz42 i 4 ostali
Bad optics my guy. He has talked about how some welfare programs that serve more focused perspectives but where many people fall through the holes due to major bureaucracy, would be consolidated into the FD because that would help them more. Argue with facts and data about that
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
Cody Bingham 22 h
Odgovor korisniku/ci @YangYouToo @BobDobbz42 i 3 ostali
Further, a negative income tax is a defined economic term, not a policy title like the Freedom Dividend, and you claimed they supported UBI. Again, by definition a negative income tax is not Unconditional, as it varies by income below a certain ceiling. And It requires wage labor
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
Cody Bingham 23 h
Odgovor korisniku/ci @BobDobbz42 @Kathy64120382 i 3 ostali
For over a decade since 2003, John Conyers introduced a "Medicare for All" bill in the House, and in 2006 Ted Kennedy tried introducing "Meducare for All" in the Senate. Both failed. Titles are great, aren't they? Now if you'd like to talk about the actual proposal...
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
Cody Bingham 23 h
Odgovor korisniku/ci @BobDobbz42 @Kathy64120382 i 3 ostali
I literally agreed that Yangs framing, being political in nature, is guilty, but the only problem with his actual policy is the idea that we must tax to pay for it, which is a problem of our times that every candidate fails on There is more to society than capitalism vs socialism
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
Cody Bingham 23 h
Odgovor korisniku/ci @BobDobbz42 @Kathy64120382 i 3 ostali
Both Milton Friedman and Charles Murray favored a negative income tax, which they may have passed off as UBI, but by definition was not Universal, thus not UBI.
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
Cody Bingham 24 h
Odgovor korisniku/ci @BobDobbz42 @Kathy64120382 i 3 ostali
Further, Yang DOES have a Universal Healthcare plan. You can easily read about it and hear him talk about it. Neither his plan nor Bernie's version of M4A are perfect.
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
Cody Bingham 3. velj
Odgovor korisniku/ci @BobDobbz42 @Kathy64120382 i 3 ostali
Any UBI used as a tool for any means is not and never would be a true UBI (yes, Yang is guilty of this to an extent), which is neither capitalist nor socialist. Key word: Universal The point is not to "liberate workers." It sees every person's basic nature as "human" not "worker"
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
Cody Bingham 3. velj
Repeat after me: Universal Healthcare/M4A and UBI are NOT mutually exclusive. Both can happen. There is absolutely no reason to be putting one vs the other when they occupy different lanes and actually work well together to combat modern forced wage labor for survival. Thanks.
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
Cody Bingham 3. velj
Odgovor korisniku/ci @BobDobbz42 @Kathy64120382 i 3 ostali
Universal Healthcare, fighting climate change, and UBI can and should ALL be done. They are NOT mutually exclusive. In fact, both UBI and M4A share a common goal in combating modern wage slavery where our access to resources is almost entirely dependent on a formal employer
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
Cody Bingham proslijedio/la je tweet
Chad Benz 🧢 3. velj
Andrew Yang's percentage of people who would not vote blue no matter who in a general is not what he failed to do, but what the other nominees failed to do! To try and twist it into some party loyalty contest is to miss the exact lessons we failed to learn last time!
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
Cody Bingham proslijedio/la je tweet
Aaron West 3. velj
Huge congrats to Sammy Watkins.
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"