Twitter | Search | |
Steinn Sigurdsson 21 Mar 13
Replying to @steinly0
Urgh. H0=68... Duh.
Reply Retweet Like
Daniel Fischer 21 Mar 13
Replying to @steinly0
I think that's a major "elephant in the room": those Ho=74 papers look *very* solid to me, but paper XVI says no way with that ...
Reply Retweet Like
Steinn Sigurdsson
yeah, the NGC4258 distance measurements ought to be very robust, hard to see how you can get systematics adding up to 2.4 sigma
Reply Retweet Like More