Twitter | Search | |
Parletre
94
Tweets
254
Following
114
Followers
Tweets
Parletre 19h
Care of offer a preview? ;)
Reply Retweet Like
Parletre 19h
How do you think about the emergence of meaning within this paradigm?
Reply Retweet Like
Parletre Jan 8
I think that this is the most important book written about Buddhism, as manifest in the current moment, since McMahan. I so hope that teachers and practitioners will read it.
Reply Retweet Like
Parletre Jan 4
Replying to @Imperfectbuddha
It does seem that constructive critique and ad hominem get intermixed in an unhelpful way in this essay, though. I still hope that a more interesting, generous dialogue will emerge.
Reply Retweet Like
Parletre Jan 4
Replying to @Imperfectbuddha
Reply Retweet Like
Parletre Jan 3
Replying to @danielmingram
Why do you think are these critique/response exchanges so unsatisfying? They don’t really seem to lead anywhere productive as far as I can tell.
Reply Retweet Like
Parletre Dec 18
Any suggestions for philosophical commentaries on the Zuangzhi?
Reply Retweet Like
Parletre Dec 11
Perhaps purification is a somatic discharge of affect when other channels of affective expression (i.e., motoric, symbolic) have been restricted.
Reply Retweet Like
Parletre Dec 11
Reply Retweet Like
Parletre Nov 29
Replying to @Meaningness
Reply Retweet Like
Parletre Nov 29
Replying to @Meaningness
Wikipedia is actually a good place to start:
Reply Retweet Like
Parletre Nov 29
Replying to @Meaningness
It always seemed to me that Gendlin’s project has huge overlaps with yours. Basically he is trying to explain how knowing works without falling into absolutism or relativism.
Reply Retweet Like
Parletre Nov 29
I think he’s brilliant. I’d be curious to know how his thinking parallels enactivism more generally.
Reply Retweet Like
Parletre Nov 29
Replying to @Meaningness
What are your thoughts about Gendlin’s philosophical works?
Reply Retweet Like
Parletre Oct 7
Replying to @mpigliucci
Reply Retweet Like
Parletre Oct 7
Replying to @mpigliucci
Reply Retweet Like
Parletre Oct 7
Replying to @mpigliucci
Reply Retweet Like
Parletre Oct 7
Replying to @mpigliucci
But I suspect it threatens the hyper-rational mentality that characterizes modern Stoicism ;)
Reply Retweet Like
Parletre Oct 7
Replying to @mpigliucci
I have to say that while I very much appreciate your writing and your comments, they tend to be painfully under-informed about the current status of psychology, and psychoanalysis in particular. There’s quite a bit of empirical support for modified versions of Freud’s formulation
Reply Retweet Like
Parletre Aug 25
Replying to @Meaningness
Fixed!
Reply Retweet Like