Twitter | Pretraživanje | |
Bill Gardner 27. velj 2018.
Odgovor korisniku/ci @slatestarcodex
The media excitement over the antidepressant meta-analysis occurred because the psychiatric consensus — that the drugs work moderately well — is not the message they’d heard.
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
Scott Alexander 27. velj 2018.
Odgovor korisniku/ci @Bill_Gardner
My impression was that everyone except Kirsch and a handful of his followers would overestimate antidepressant efficacy if asked. Do you think the opposite?
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
Lars Iver 27. velj 2018.
Odgovor korisniku/ci @slatestarcodex
Also worth noting, all psychoactive drugs affect other functions of the brain as well. (Entropy says probably for the worse.) A small positive outcome on what is being measured (in this case the Hamilton Rating Scale?) does not necessarily equate a net positive outcome overall.
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
𝕵𝐚𝐲𝐚𝐫𝐚𝐯𝐚 27. velj 2018.
Odgovor korisniku/ci @slatestarcodex
Thanks! There is also this: (paywalled unfortunately)
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
Tim G 27. velj 2018.
Odgovor korisniku/ci @slatestarcodex
Great follow up article! My problem with anti-depressants is that depression, to me, is a very effective canary in the coal mine. Using antidepressants too often just kills the canary, but they do help sometimes.
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"