|
@skdh | |||||
|
Potential White House open-access edict could upend scientific publishers physicstoday.scitation.org/do/10.1063/PT.…
|
||||||
|
||||||
|
Simone Sturniolo
@SturnioloSimone
|
25. pro |
|
I don't think I would have ever uttered these words, but: this might be one Trump policy I agree with - sort of.
|
||
|
|
||
|
Simone Sturniolo
@SturnioloSimone
|
25. pro |
|
It's still got the characteristic Trump hallmark of clumsily blundering through a complex issue with all the delicacy of an elephant in a crystal shop, but it's at least going in the right direction.
|
||
|
|
||
|
DKShadow( )
@DKshad0w
|
25. pro |
|
Please! pic.twitter.com/PteT2l92La
|
||
|
|
||
|
Kyle Pomykala
@KylePomykala
|
25. pro |
|
God this would make my research so much easier
|
||
|
|
||
|
Abnormal Accrual
@bbm010
|
27. pro |
|
The embargos are horrendous.
|
||
|
|
||
|
A R Cooray
@acooray
|
25. pro |
|
Elsevier doesn’t have a lobbyist in DC? Shocking.
|
||
|
|
||
|
Neal Evenhuis
@BFly52
|
26. pro |
|
They prob do, but Trump doesn’t inderstand them ...
|
||
|
|
||
|
Aurelian of Rome
@AurelianofRome
|
25. pro |
|
|
||
|
j☯︎hnny
@johnnygreavu
|
25. pro |
|
good
|
||
|
|
||
|
Red_Pill_MD
@FlyMD
|
25. pro |
|
Excellent
|
||
|
|
||