Twitter | Search | |
Sashka Ⓥ
Biophilia| veganism| anti-speciesism| books| minimalism| degrowth| philosophy| atheism| antinatalism| VHEMT| CF by choice | pro choice | pro-euthanasia
8,492
Tweets
3,353
Following
1,448
Followers
Tweets
Sashka Ⓥ Jan 31
By then everything is shattered into pieces by all these humans...and what does a plateau help with these crazy digits?!
Reply Retweet Like
Sashka Ⓥ retweeted
Cats With No Hope🐈 Jan 18
DESPERATE HELP IS NEEDED It's is only thanks to your generosity that all this is possible. Help is needed to provide over 100+ cats daily food, to treat the sick & injured & TNR No amount is too small to make a difference 💓 or
Reply Retweet Like
Sashka Ⓥ retweeted
Martin Tye Jan 19
Too many people view "renewable energy" as somehow impact free, the silver bullet for a sustainable future- it's not. We have nearly 8 billion people needing it & energy is not their only demand.
Reply Retweet Like
Sashka Ⓥ retweeted
Karin Kuhlemann Jan 7
This ultimate threat multiplier is human population growth. It fuels global warming and environmental devastation, while placing more and more people in harm's way. Apparently we rather watch our civilizations break down than talk about the dire need for procreative restraint.
Reply Retweet Like
Sashka Ⓥ retweeted
Brendan May Jan 11
We knew would cause mass migration of people. Not sure we predicted that scores of terrified would seek safe haven in residential streets. This is reality now. But still, let’s protect the coal industry, eh.
Reply Retweet Like
Sashka Ⓥ Jan 11
You lost me over this clumsy and false accusation, so lame. is the real deal. Mass extinction, biodiversity loss, runaway climate change, soil degradation and ocean die-off are too serious issues to be handled by a strictly ideological group.
Reply Retweet Like
Sashka Ⓥ Jan 11
Replying to @vishnimaha
Valid point. But I even prefer all life gone, than all this suffering due to human activities.
Reply Retweet Like
Sashka Ⓥ Jan 10
"If we go extinct, other species will have a chance to recover. I’ll never see the day when there are no humans on the planet, but I can imagine what a magnificent world it would be – provided we go soon enough."
Reply Retweet Like
Sashka Ⓥ retweeted
DavidⓋ 🌱🦇🦉🐮 Jan 4
Do you want to wear fur ? Is your vanity & selfishness worth it then animals lives ?! This is what happens to the animals used to make fur coats treat them like trash 🧥. How is this still legal it’s buoyed me 😔😢Are you ok with that?
Reply Retweet Like
Sashka Ⓥ Jan 7
Reply Retweet Like
Sashka Ⓥ Jan 6
Replying to @catswithnohope
Terrible, I can spot rare protected large cat fur and even house cat fur. And why would anybody in a warm/hot climate like this (even in winter it's never below 0°C) need such warm garments in the first place?! This is sickening.
Reply Retweet Like
Sashka Ⓥ retweeted
EcoInternet Jan 5
Terrifying Images Show The Overwhelming Scale of Australia's Bushfires From Space: Science Alert MORE w/ EcoSearch - news: web:
Reply Retweet Like
Sashka Ⓥ Jan 5
Replying to @lesuknight
Absolutely!
Reply Retweet Like
Sashka Ⓥ Jan 5
Reply Retweet Like
Sashka Ⓥ Jan 5
Reply Retweet Like
Sashka Ⓥ retweeted
Dick Smith Nov 27
Powerful article on the link between climate change & population growth. I wonder why organisations like the UN have policies on climate change, but not population growth.
Reply Retweet Like
Sashka Ⓥ retweeted
Marianne Dec 30
Replying to @HarpySmith
Universal income should be mandatory... it shouldn't even be a question. Forcing people to work simply to exist (often still within the confines of abject poverty) is unethical rat race propagating nonsense drilled into us from birth. We never asked for this life.
Reply Retweet Like
Sashka Ⓥ retweeted
Ben See Jan 1
'the biggest environmental polluters are not big fossil fuel companies. They are big agribusiness and factory farming, with six powerful food industry giants – Archer Daniels Midland, Cargill, Dean Foods, Dow AgroSciences, Tyson and Monsanto... – playing a major role.'
Reply Retweet Like
Sashka Ⓥ Jan 1
Reply Retweet Like
Sashka Ⓥ Dec 29
Ad hominem because you don't like his answers is neither an intelligent nor a compassionate way to communicate. You are not genuinely interested in the topic, this reply makes it crystal clear.
Reply Retweet Like