Twitter | Search | |
Sarah Kendzior
NYT writes puff piece on Tiffany Trump intended to soften Donald's image, admits Trump campaign guided it in piece
Reply Retweet Like More
Sarah Kendzior 1 Oct 16
Replying to @sarahkendzior
NYT piece a disgrace. First, they admit it's a biased piece with selective sources. Second, Tiffany did not consent. Why drag her into this?
Reply Retweet Like
Jared 1 Oct 16
Replying to @sarahkendzior
troubling. Reminds me of the nonsense they reported a week ago about Clinton ties to Goldman. No new news. All innuendo.
Reply Retweet Like
Four Corners Media 🔦 1 Oct 16
Replying to @sarahkendzior @nytimes
"several media organizations, including have criticized the accuracy of her reporting"
Reply Retweet Like
Sarah Kendzior 1 Oct 16
Replying to @FourCM @nytimes
Yes. She has long history of writing profiles that are inaccurate, racist or both. No wonder Trump team worked with her.
Reply Retweet Like
🎃Ren’s Frights Activist🎃 1 Oct 16
Replying to @sarahkendzior @FourCM
OMG she's the one who wrote that racist "angry black woman" article about Shonda Rhymes!
Reply Retweet Like
Iron Freedom 1 Oct 16
Replying to @sarahkendzior @FourCM
They fire Hedges and keep her. NYT gets away with too much nonsense.
Reply Retweet Like
Four Corners Media 🔦 1 Oct 16
and it's the fourth lead story on the homepage
Reply Retweet Like
Sarah Kendzior 1 Oct 16
Replying to @AndrewMinDC
He massively lost the debate and spent past week -- and lifetime -- insulting and degrading women.
Reply Retweet Like
James E Powell 1 Oct 16
Apparently, they think so. They've been fluffing him all along
Reply Retweet Like
Amanda Rivkin/a 2 Oct 16
Replying to @sarahkendzior
with rumors flying Marla leaked the returns (I suspect Clinton camp), perhaps this is why the puff piece: foot in the door?
Reply Retweet Like
Sarah Kendzior 2 Oct 16
Replying to @amandarivkin
Reply Retweet Like
Amanda Rivkin/a 2 Oct 16
Replying to @sarahkendzior
I suspect drip drop from Clinton camp, original source of which might be Marla Maples, part of carefully timed media strategy
Reply Retweet Like
Mridul 1 Oct 16
Replying to @sarahkendzior
Cmon Sarah why you see negativity in one article on his daughter.NYT has been viciously anti Trump,u knw that.y get wrkd up?
Reply Retweet Like
Sarah Kendzior 1 Oct 16
Replying to @mridulkrishnan
I didn't criticize NYT as a whole. I criticized this piece and its author (deservedly) and I wondered why NYT would run it.
Reply Retweet Like
Mridul 1 Oct 16
Replying to @sarahkendzior
Why see harm in it.Thats the qs.It was not glorifying him,he gets hit daily by a tonof -ve articles&the piece is def no pro T
Reply Retweet Like
Francis Materi 1 Oct 16
Because it's PR, not journalism. Goes against standards.
Reply Retweet Like
Mridul 1 Oct 16
The problem with MSM journos is credibility is all time low.Trump will lose but they too stand to lose somewat
Reply Retweet Like
Francis Materi 1 Oct 16
Publishing PR, with sources restricted by a campaign, won't help credibility. Stains NYT and embarrasses all.
Reply Retweet Like