Twitter | Pretraživanje | |
Sarah Jamie Lewis
Executive Director . Enforcing Consent & Resisting Surveillance with Cryptography. Vegan Lesbian, Queer Anarchist. Donate:
20.758
Tweetovi
509
Pratim
29.366
Osobe koje vas prate
Tweetovi
Sarah Jamie Lewis proslijedio/la je tweet
Zcash Foundation 31. sij
It's here! ZF's annual "State of the Foundation" report, reviewing 2019 and looking forward to the rest of 2020:
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
Sarah Jamie Lewis 1. velj
More rust kernel hacking this evening and woo, got basic context switching!
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
Sarah Jamie Lewis 31. sij
Odgovor korisniku/ci @embeddedfinance
My reasons for leaving are completely distinct from my reasons for not going back. I'm still a British Citizen, I still have family and connections there, what happens there still fundamentally impacts my life, brexit significantly so.
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
Sarah Jamie Lewis 31. sij
I don't really know how to feel about . I left the UK 8 years ago, and with the loss of freedom of movement goes the last real argument for ever going back to live there - all that is left is to watch it descend into the shadows.
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
Sarah Jamie Lewis 31. sij
Really liking how my little rust kernel is coming along, spent some time the last few days tidying up the networking stack, implementing a basic shared queue primitive, now also featuring prototype cpu detection and a working time widget.
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
Sarah Jamie Lewis proslijedio/la je tweet
Sarah Jamie Lewis 29. pro 2018.
Odgovor korisniku/ci @SarahJamieLewis
The more I understand the more ridiculously magical reality becomes.
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
Sarah Jamie Lewis 30. sij
Odgovor korisniku/ci @woodyatpch
Broadcast airwaves are a very limited public utility and it makes some sense to regulate access and speech rights. The same does not apply to the internet and, going further, any attempt to do should be treated with the utmost hostility.
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
Sarah Jamie Lewis 30. sij
Odgovor korisniku/ci @woodyatpch
The Internet isn't a broadcast medium - the government has no moral authority on which to regulate the speech rights of private citizens in private spaces, and like it or not that includes compelled speech on online news aggregators to favour the regulators preferred propaganda.
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
Sarah Jamie Lewis 29. sij
For all the issues in the new report, I think that Recommendation 73 really demonstrates how far removed regulators are from the realities Interent and their hubris to assume you can force a populace to engage with your media.
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
Sarah Jamie Lewis 29. sij
Odgovor korisniku/ci @SarahJamieLewis
"No one is reading the news we consider to be trustworthy and reliable" "Well let's pour more money into that hole and force those internet sites to put our content in places where people will read it, and also regulate all the other content" Seems to be the broad strokes...
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
Sarah Jamie Lewis 29. sij
Odgovor korisniku/ci @SarahJamieLewis
The "crisis" of declining readership of platforms that have refused to modernize in the age of the internet.
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
Sarah Jamie Lewis 29. sij
Odgovor korisniku/ci @SarahJamieLewis
They want to put media piracy on the same level as unauthorized broadcast retransmission.
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
Sarah Jamie Lewis 29. sij
Oh great, the regulators are at it again.
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
Sarah Jamie Lewis proslijedio/la je tweet
Sarah Jamie Lewis 24. ruj
Odgovor korisniku/ci @SarahJamieLewis
Harm is an ethical nightmare to define, being gay and doing crimes on the other hand are pretty straight forward (and in many jurisdictions the same thing).
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
Sarah Jamie Lewis proslijedio/la je tweet
Sarah Jamie Lewis 24. ruj
Permission is hereby granted, free of charge, to any person obtaining a copy of this software and associated documentation files (the "Software"), to deal in the Software without restriction(...)subject to the following conditions: Be Gay Do Crimes
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
Sarah Jamie Lewis 29. sij
Odgovor korisniku/ci @SarahJamieLewis
And if you really think such a license is needed, then I have a proposal:
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
Sarah Jamie Lewis 29. sij
Odgovor korisniku/ci @SarahJamieLewis
Also, while we are on the subject
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
Sarah Jamie Lewis 29. sij
Odgovor korisniku/ci @SarahJamieLewis
I mean...the decision you make has no bearing at all on anything, it won't significantly impact reality...but it's the principle of thing. If we going to pretend open source licenses mean anything then these things have to mean *something*.
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
Sarah Jamie Lewis 29. sij
Please don't adopt (un-reviewed) software licenses that require licensees to agree to be bound to flawed metaethics in exchange for use.
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
Sarah Jamie Lewis proslijedio/la je tweet
Sarah Jamie Lewis 22. ruj
Many of you were never subject to an exam on ethics, torts, contract law & licensing during your computer science education and it shows.
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"