Tweetovi

	Robyn Pennacchia @RobynElyse	7 h
	The thing that really unites people who oppose M4A is having absolutely no goddamned clue about how our current system or insurance companies work.
	Prikaži podatke ·

	Robyn Pennacchia @RobynElyse	7 h
	Odgovor korisniku/ci @Noneya_Mindyers @C_Stroop Yeah, you have given absolutely no consideration to how things work in reality and, even more clearly, have absolutely no idea about how they work now. Good luck the next time you need healthcare and your wonderful insurance company *does their job* and tells you NO.
	Prikaz razgovora ·

	Robyn Pennacchia @RobynElyse	7 h
	Odgovor korisniku/ci @Noneya_Mindyers @C_Stroop Yeah, I've been advocating for single payer since elementary school (side effect of having a patient advocate for a mom!) — there is truly nothing you can tell me that would be new information.
	Prikaz razgovora ·

	Robyn Pennacchia @RobynElyse	7 h
	Odgovor korisniku/ci @Noneya_Mindyers @C_Stroop If the half-assed plans covered everything, they would *also* make insurance companies unnecessary.
	Prikaz razgovora ·

	Robyn Pennacchia @RobynElyse	7 h
	Odgovor korisniku/ci @Noneya_Mindyers @C_Stroop Actually, the plan is that it covers *everything,* thus making insurance companies *unnecessary.* It's not that insurance companies will be made illegal, but that they will be made unnecessary, because everything will be covered. Dig?
	Prikaz razgovora ·

	Robyn Pennacchia @RobynElyse	7 h
	Odgovor korisniku/ci @Noneya_Mindyers @C_Stroop One of the big expenses in health care is billing. It costs $$$$ and time for people to send out bills to different insurance companies. All of the bills going to the same place, automatically, saves a fuckton of money.
	Prikaz razgovora ·

	Robyn Pennacchia @RobynElyse	7 h
	Odgovor korisniku/ci @Noneya_Mindyers @C_Stroop No, they don't exist. That is absolutely ridiculous. Also, the GOP will be able to take a shitty half-assed plan that people don't like away a hell of a lot more easily than a good and simple plan that covers every body and every thing.
	Prikaz razgovora ·

	Robyn Pennacchia @RobynElyse	8 h
	Odgovor korisniku/ci @Noneya_Mindyers @C_Stroop 4. It doesn't save money on administrative/billing fees (20% of all health care costs) 5. It doesn't allow for the negotiating of drug costs 6. It doesn't have any of the features that make M4A a less expensive option than traditional insurance.
	Prikaz razgovora ·

	Robyn Pennacchia @RobynElyse	8 h
	Odgovor korisniku/ci @Noneya_Mindyers @C_Stroop Here's what happens with a two tiered system. 1) It doesn't have to cover everything 2) It's not that good, because stuff for poor people in the US rarely is 3) DOCTORS DON'T HAVE TO TAKE IT.
	Prikaz razgovora ·

	Robyn Pennacchia @RobynElyse	8 h
	Odgovor korisniku/ci @Noneya_Mindyers @C_Stroop We should. But also that plan is not pragmatic — it would be a huge mess that cost more than M4A, people would be annoyed and we'd NEVER get UHC. We would be better off doing nothing than doing that, because we'd at least still have the hope of getting it done in the future.
	Prikaz razgovora ·

	Robyn Pennacchia proslijedio/la je tweet
	Stephen Robinson @SER1897	8 h
	I’m going to write a screenplay about the five black women out of the three black people in Iowa who somehow wound up standing behind Buttigieg during his speech. twitter.com/colleenschlege…
	Prikaži podatke ·

	Robyn Pennacchia @RobynElyse	8 h
	Odgovor korisniku/ci @SER1897 I saw that and was like "OH MAN, I KNOW WHO IS GONNA HAVE SOME THOUGHTS ON THIS."
	Prikaz razgovora ·

	Robyn Pennacchia proslijedio/la je tweet
	Erick Fernandez @ErickFernandez	9 h
	Odgovor korisniku/ci @ErickFernandez Maybe it was just a coincidence that there are five Black women in the front row right behind Pete Buttigieg and they got there early and got very good seats! I am a bit more cynical than that though.
	Prikaz razgovora ·

	Robyn Pennacchia @RobynElyse	8 h
	Odgovor korisniku/ci @Noneya_Mindyers @C_Stroop Him being white or cis has literally nothing to do with why I don't support him. That would apply to the majority of candidates still running. I don't support him because he wants to do everything half-assed.
	Prikaz razgovora ·

	Robyn Pennacchia @RobynElyse	9 h
	Odgovor korisniku/ci @C_Stroop @Noneya_Mindyers Exactly. Representation is great, but that doesn't mean that what he stands for and what he wants to actually do are progressive things. These are two different things entirely.
	Prikaz razgovora ·

	Robyn Pennacchia @RobynElyse	9 h
	Odgovor korisniku/ci @EyesOnTheRight THERE COULD HAVE BEEN MANY POSSIBILITIES.
	Prikaz razgovora ·

	Robyn Pennacchia @RobynElyse	9 h
	Odgovor korisniku/ci @RobynElyse It is entirely possible that this happened to me recently and that I am still mad about it.
	Prikaz razgovora ·

	Robyn Pennacchia @RobynElyse	9 h
	Mostly I just feel personally insulted by Pete claiming that many progressives are supporting him. It's like when you're looking at a guy because you know you hate him but can't remember why and then suddenly realize he thinks you're checking him out.
	Prikaži podatke ·

	Robyn Pennacchia @RobynElyse	9 h
	Odgovor korisniku/ci @snipy At this point it's just absurd. It is just absurd. Like, I get it. They're seeing the writing on the wall with Biden and they need a viable moderate, but it's super weird to be this obvious about it.
	Prikaz razgovora ·

	Robyn Pennacchia @RobynElyse	9 h
	OK, so they're on CNN going on about how it will be really unfair to Buttigieg, specifically, if he won and didn't get to give a real, official victory speech tonight. Are you fucking kidding me? Wouldn't that be bad for anyone who won?
	Prikaži podatke ·