I’m confused..wouldnt this be fantastic news? Completely craters the case fatality rate? This is an honest question..
-
-
-
Yeah, that was my first thought.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Over the threshold? How do you figure. The estimate is 60-70% The report is based on old data. Testing rates have increased a lot since this data was collected. So expect that multiplying factor to drop since testing is catching more cases that were previously missed.
- Show replies
-
-
-
Why is this unnerving? That means it is not as dangerous as feared once infected if all of those 6-24X higher cases were asymptomatic and the death rate is 6-24X LOWER than believed. That is VERY good news.
-
What it would really make the case for is masks. Means super spreadability and it still packs a wicked punch with death as a consequence. But we are leaning that those damaged, lung and other organs is significant.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
So, we can safely say that there are about 30 millions infected people in the US?
-
No you cant because all of this is finger in the air. Any hard blood studies have shown max 25% jn hardest hit areas. Fact is we dont know. Even at 30% likely halfway, at best to herd immunity. But > contagiousness, R0, means higher % needed for herd so maybe 1/3
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
Which means the death count is also hidden and under reported. All those extra deaths (year over year) WERE NOT from cramps and migraines.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Isn't that a good thing?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.