Twitter | Search | |
π™Ήπšžπš•πš’πšŽ 28 Jan 17
Replying to @resisterhood
First and foremost, it is NOT NORMAL. Obama filed for 2012 reelection in April 2011. Incumbent declaring before midterms is unheard of. /2
Reply Retweet Like
π™Ήπšžπš•πš’πšŽ 28 Jan 17
Replying to @resisterhood
Several MAJOR implications. If officially a candidate, can use candidate status to curry favor with PACs, businesses, other organizations /3
Reply Retweet Like
π™Ήπšžπš•πš’πšŽ 28 Jan 17
Replying to @resisterhood
Because he's acting as Trump the candidate, not Trump the president. Different rules apply. /4
Reply Retweet Like
π™Ήπšžπš•πš’πšŽ 28 Jan 17
Replying to @resisterhood
And further muddies the already swampy ethical waters of financial gain, & business transactions. /8
Reply Retweet Like
π™Ήπšžπš•πš’πšŽ 28 Jan 17
Replying to @resisterhood
Filed 5PM . 5 HOURS after swearing in. This is what is up against. /9
Reply Retweet Like
π™Ήπšžπš•πš’πšŽ 28 Jan 17
Replying to @resisterhood
Diabolical maneuvering to skirt all conventional forms of . Norms don't matter; it's all about finding new ways to silence us /10
Reply Retweet Like
π™Ήπšžπš•πš’πšŽ 28 Jan 17
Replying to @resisterhood
Again, THIS IS NOT NORMAL. Stay vigilant, stay ready to fight. We're going to have to defy our own norms to .
Reply Retweet Like
tryin' 2b significant susie! 28 Jan 17
Replying to @resisterhood @FEC
Does the FEC automatically accept?
Reply Retweet Like
Red Sofa Literary 28 Jan 17
no!!!!!!
Reply Retweet Like
L George 28 Jan 17
Holy shit!!!
Reply Retweet Like
Mirjana 28 Jan 17
Replying to @resisterhood @FEC
What fresh hell?
Reply Retweet Like
Philosodork 28 Jan 17
Replying to @resisterhood
Under circumstances it seems very difficult for this to survive 1st amend. challenge.
Reply Retweet Like
Bob Blaskiewicz 28 Jan 17
Who has standing to challenge this?
Reply Retweet Like
Philosodork 28 Jan 17
Well it may not be ripe until an org loses its status, which they could then appeal on 1st am grounds.
Reply Retweet Like
Philosodork 28 Jan 17
Also we should realize that may be part of their strategy, b/c it would free GOP nonprofits to openly campaign
Reply Retweet Like
Weaponised Gravitas 28 Jan 17
Replying to @resisterhood @FEC
So if convicted of, say, tax evasion or breach of ethics, would playing field change?
Reply Retweet Like
Philosodork 28 Jan 17
But at this point that's a bullet we may have to bite; surrender our knight to save our rook, if you will.
Reply Retweet Like
Tru 🌊 28 Jan 17
Replying to @resisterhood @rjcc
And when were the midterms? Weren't they in 2010?
Reply Retweet Like
TeckieGirl βœŠπŸ½πŸ’ƒπŸ½β€οΈπŸΆπŸͺ 28 Jan 17
they need to rip it up
Reply Retweet Like