Twitter | Search | |
New Real Peer Review
New , with blackjack and intelligent, evidence-respecting academic peers. Complaints should be filed with Machine Priestess (use fax)
8,322
Tweets
29
Following
58,772
Followers
Tweets
New Real Peer Review retweeted
Amir Sariaslan 23h
"In God we trust, all others must bring data".
Reply Retweet Like
New Real Peer Review Oct 17
PhD dissertation: "Investigating the invisible cord: an analytical autoethnography of first panic attack"
Reply Retweet Like
New Real Peer Review Oct 17
"Children’s food maps: using social mapping to understand school foodscapes"
Reply Retweet Like
New Real Peer Review Oct 16
"Autobituary : the Life and/as Death of David Bowie & the Specters from Mourning"
Reply Retweet Like
New Real Peer Review Oct 16
When you write an academic paper about your dog.
Reply Retweet Like
New Real Peer Review Oct 16
Reply Retweet Like
New Real Peer Review retweeted
James Lindsay Oct 14
Notice: grievance studies is designed so that it cannot be criticized. Think it's wrong? You're just angry about losing your power.
Reply Retweet Like
New Real Peer Review Oct 13
Reply Retweet Like
New Real Peer Review Oct 11
A recent contribution to the dog park journal:
Reply Retweet Like
New Real Peer Review Oct 10
Reply Retweet Like
New Real Peer Review retweeted
Patrick Markey Oct 8
When anti-video game researchers sell their science at the expense of truth
Reply Retweet Like
New Real Peer Review Oct 8
We wonder if this classic text is also a part of an even more subtle, even more deeply undercover academic hoax. A Deep if you will
Reply Retweet Like
New Real Peer Review Oct 7
Reply Retweet Like
New Real Peer Review Oct 7
Replying to @RealPeerReview
The insights provided by this paper...
Reply Retweet Like
New Real Peer Review Oct 7
There's apparently no need to hide the activism these days.
Reply Retweet Like
New Real Peer Review Oct 7
A recent contribution to the same journal that published the dog park hoax paper. This is apparently a bad thing.
Reply Retweet Like
New Real Peer Review Oct 6
"Using Racial and Class Differences in Infant Mortality to Teach about White Privilege: A Cooperative Group Activity"
Reply Retweet Like
New Real Peer Review retweeted
OκULTRA XP🧿 Oct 6
I wonder if people from "dox OKULTRA" groups will now start subscribing to paid anti-plagiarism services and submitting the Mein Kampf paper to try and find what service one of my (t)employers uses
Reply Retweet Like
New Real Peer Review retweeted
Mandy Dennison Oct 4
Dr. Strickland on why she's not a full professor: "...I never filled out the paperwork. It's all on me. I think people are thinking it's because I'm a woman, I'm being held back. I'm just a lazy person. I do what I want to do and that wasn't worth doing."
Reply Retweet Like
New Real Peer Review retweeted
OκULTRA XP🧿 Oct 4
A shame these alternate ways of knowing don't enable reviewers in a distinctly nonminor women's studies journal to "know" when they get a literal Mein Kampf snowclone as submission
Reply Retweet Like