Twitter | Pretraživanje | |
Philip Goff
Philosopher of consciousness at Durham Uni and author of 'Galileo's Error.' Panpsychist, religious fictionalist, and vigorous opponent of neo-liberalism.
9.692
Tweetovi
756
Pratim
6.802
Osobe koje vas prate
Tweetovi
Philip Goff 2 h
Bad choice , given that Quine believed in mathematical objects.
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
Philip Goff 2 h
Odgovor korisniku/ci @Rongreen5
yes
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
Philip Goff 2 h
Odgovor korisniku/ci @_attlee
I don't think our ordinary notion of reason is relativised to aims/desires. Why are reasons for me grounded in my own desires less problematic than reasons for me grounded in, e.g. your desires, or the fact that you're suffering?
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
Philip Goff proslijedio/la je tweet
Alex Moran 4 h
Odgovor korisniku/ci @GuyLongworth @Philip_Goff
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
Philip Goff proslijedio/la je tweet
Barry C Smith 8 h
Aristotelian Soc talk by on *******ism and free will
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
Philip Goff 14 h
I definitely think maths/logic truths are more certain that value truths. But once we accept that maths/logic truths are not true by definition, we're in the realm of Platonism, & not much of an extension is required IMHO to get objective value truths.
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
Philip Goff 14 h
Odgovor korisniku/ci @smithbarryc
What do you mean?
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
Philip Goff 15 h
My point is the fact that it is unintelligible in this sense is not dependent on how we use words. It's a facts that's independent of us and would've obtained not matter how the facts of thought and language turned out.
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
Philip Goff 15 h
On my way to London to examine a PhD on 'Modal Rationalism & the Metaphysics of Mind' before addressing the on 'Panpsychism & Free Will.'
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
Philip Goff 15 h
Very interesting. Yes, I'm inclined to think Chalmers' notion of a 'direct phenomenal concept' is a limit case, which we approach in mindfulness. I disagree with this thread from 7. I find the more one meditates, the more pronounced the hard problem of consciousness becomes.
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
Philip Goff 15 h
It's not unintelligible because of how we define words
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
Philip Goff 15 h
Odgovor korisniku/ci @_attlee
"..the coherent and non-vacuous notion of "reason" which we"re acquainted with is relativized to our aims and desires, and presumably, these properties are not."
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
Philip Goff 15 h
Odgovor korisniku/ci @_attlee
Because I gave the line above where this is explicit and you haven't responded to that.
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
Philip Goff 15 h
Odgovor korisniku/ci @RealisticNilist @_attlee
I think it's a good objection when you take yourself to be giving a reductive explanation of something, rather than taking it as primitive.
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
Philip Goff 2. velj
Odgovor korisniku/ci @_attlee
Again, this just assumes a Humean conception of reasons and motivation, which no robust realist will accept. I think we're going round in circles...
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
Philip Goff 2. velj
Odgovor korisniku/ci @N_D_Cannon @KanDerWat
Maybe the value chapter Nagel's mind and cosmos for a defence of the view we're talking about.
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
Philip Goff 2. velj
Odgovor korisniku/ci @N_D_Cannon @KanDerWat
I'm afraid I don't think it's on right lines at all. I think if you're gonna be a robust realist you should be prepared to spend money to properly account for the epistemology.
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
Philip Goff 2. velj
Odgovor korisniku/ci @KanDerWat @N_D_Cannon
I find what Enoch says on the epistemology especially unconvincing.
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
Philip Goff 2. velj
Odgovor korisniku/ci @_attlee
Why can't you ground objective morality in the notmativity of pain?
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
Philip Goff 2. velj
Odgovor korisniku/ci @N_D_Cannon @samuelzmclean @KanDerWat
It's hard to make sense of particularism on my way of thinking about the ground of ethics as relations between normative and descriptive universals.
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"