|
@patrickc | |||||
|
Great to see South San Francisco approve another 800 homes yesterday. This is in addition to the 2,800+ already under development and represents a combined *18%* increase in their housing stock. (SF approved a 1.6% increase last year.)
bizjournals.com/sanfrancisco/n…
|
||||||
|
||||||
|
|
Patrick Collison
@patrickc
|
15. stu |
|
This is good for the environment (shorter commutes) 🌳, good for families (affordable homes) 👨👩👧👦, good for economic mobility (📈 nber.org/papers/w24661), and good for the country (🇺🇸 faculty.chicagobooth.edu/chang-tai.hsie…).
|
||
|
||
|
Chris Woodrich
@cwoodrich
|
15. stu |
|
The man pictured is the developer of the project in question
|
||
|
|
||
|
TGN 🤖
@TheGrtNecessity
|
15. stu |
|
Just another reminder, you don't own real estate, you only rent it from the government...
|
||
|
|
||
|
Cory Klein
@coryfklein
|
15. stu |
|
That 18% increase figure cannot be correct. That would indicate there are only 15,000 homes in San Francisco today, a city with a population of 880,000 people. I mean, I know the city is packed, but not 53-people-per-household kind of packed.
|
||
|
|
||
|
¯\_(ツ)_/¯
@adropboxspace
|
15. stu |
|
south sf and sf are two different municipalities.
|
||
|
|
||
|
Tahoe “I Take Your Question” Rhea
@DJTahoe
|
15. stu |
|
I won’t hold my breath that this will drive rent/housing costs down...
|
||
|
|
||
|
Hotep Mises
@duplicationcube
|
15. stu |
|
The bubble will pop by the time they're built and they won't be necessary. Central planning always works out in the end.
|
||
|
|
||
|
Curtis Sweeten
@swedenfork
|
16. stu |
|
Oakland is adding 6800 units to its housing stock this year ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
|
||
|
|
||