|
No Fee Science
@
NoFee_Science
France, Earth.
|
|
To solve the problems facing our planetary home, we need public trust. For that, we need #openscience. Don't just #MarchForScience...#MarchForBetterScience!
|
|
|
939
Tweetovi
|
182
Pratim
|
295
Osobe koje vas prate
|
| Tweetovi |
| No Fee Science proslijedio/la je tweet | ||
|
Björn Brembs
@brembs
|
12 h |
|
Two new entries in our name-and-shame document on journal rank in evaluations, this time both from @UniFreiburg asking prospective employees to only "publish in high ranking journals":
docs.google.com/document/d/1vW…
nearing 50 examples now...
|
||
|
|
||
| No Fee Science proslijedio/la je tweet | ||
|
Jon Tennant
@Protohedgehog
|
13 h |
|
The @open_con saga continues. I wish I could neatly summarise this latest update, but I really can't.
It's a mess of inconsistencies, obscure motives, and deeply worrying behaviour.
I will not be commenting further on this matter in public for now.
fossilsandshit.com/re-opencon-sta…
|
||
|
|
||
| No Fee Science proslijedio/la je tweet | ||
|
FX Coudert
@fxcoudert
|
5. velj |
|
Quand je lis @marindacos « Dans de nombreuses disciplines, il n’y a pas ou peu de culture de partage et de documentation des données », j'ai envie de répondre : dans de nombreuses discipline on n'y est pas formé et il n'existe aucun soutien pour le faire. lejournal.cnrs.fr/articles/les-d…
|
||
|
|
||
|
No Fee Science
@NoFee_Science
|
5. velj |
|
"what is it, if not censorship, when we consider the combination of prohibitive digital paywalls + the blocking of democratized access sites such as Sci-Hub,under pressure from publishers whose driving motivation is private profit rather than public good?"
forms.gle/TrnU1ds88AtoTN…
|
||
|
|
||
| No Fee Science proslijedio/la je tweet | ||
|
Alexandra Gros ⚛ 🧠 🐭
@alexandra_gros
|
5. velj |
|
Nous, jeunes chercheuses et chercheurs, manifestons aujourd'hui notre inquiétude grandissante face à la LPPR et à ses conséquences sur l'Université française. #ESR #LPPR
liberation.fr/debats/2020/02…
|
||
|
|
||
| No Fee Science proslijedio/la je tweet | ||
|
Christopher James Stevens - Metaphysiology
@WorldImagining
|
4. velj |
|
Avis aux jeunes chercheur.e.s de Bordeaux qui abritent l'espoir de poursuivre une carrière scientifique en France ; rdv ce jeudi à 12h30 dans l'amphi Louis de l'ISPED pour une présentation/décorticage de la #LPPR.
bordeaux-neurocampus.fr/reunion-de-pre…
|
||
|
|
||
| No Fee Science proslijedio/la je tweet | ||
|
Paul Thirion
@PaulThir
|
4. velj |
|
Quand les masques tombent...
Ou l'illusion perdue d'un monde idéal où @publishers et communauté scientifique auraient les mêmes objectifs généreux...
Mais cette fois avec une réaction forte du bord du European Law Journal qui démissionne en bloc !
europeanlawblog.eu
#BRAVO
|
||
|
|
||
| No Fee Science proslijedio/la je tweet | ||
|
Alexis Verger
@Alexis_Verger
|
4. velj |
|
mars 2000 --> consacrer 3% du PIB à la R&D pour 2010
juin 2010 --> consacrer 3% du PIB à la R&D pour... 2020
novembre 2016 --> consacrer 3% du PIB à la R&D d'ici 10 ans
2019 #LPPR --> l'ambition est de consacrer 3% du PIB à la recherche
#GroundhogDay pic.twitter.com/j0eBb7Ajs7
|
||
|
|
||
| No Fee Science proslijedio/la je tweet | ||
|
Dominique Fournier
@dom34dom
|
3. velj |
|
Pour accompagner les chercheurs INRAE vers la science ouverte, tous les membres de la DIPSO ont reçu un exemplaire du livre de @bernardrentier #scienceouverte le défi de la transparence #bonneidee #cestencorenoel #capscienceouverte @ist_inra merci @Holo_08 pic.twitter.com/Jkw4PThSo7
|
||
|
|
||
| No Fee Science proslijedio/la je tweet | ||
|
Lenny Teytelman
@lteytelman
|
3. velj |
|
As I've said before many times, "Every single time we decide to mandate immediate OA & to accelerate publishing due a disease/health crisis, we must pause and ask ourselves how we do not mandate it for all research."
It's just heartbreaking and maddening to keep repeating this.
|
||
|
|
||
|
No Fee Science
@NoFee_Science
|
2. velj |
|
It will be interesting to see how the various facets of the community respond to this, short and longer term. Theoretically it's a "better" measure, but has nothing of the appeal that IF exerts over researcher egos. It's "good" that it doesn't, but may sadly also be its defeat. twitter.com/ceptional/stat…
|
||
|
|
||
|
No Fee Science
@NoFee_Science
|
1. velj |
|
Naive to believe this paper couldn't have passed peer review! I wish it were the case too, but it is not. I regularly find myself face to face with rubbish peer reviewed papers that may never be retracted.
|
||
|
|
||
|
No Fee Science
@NoFee_Science
|
1. velj |
|
Not an ad hominem since the referend is the argument, not you. Anyway, what's nice about preprints is also that this got debunked in next to no time!
|
||
|
|
||
|
No Fee Science
@NoFee_Science
|
1. velj |
|
Or maybe just naive:
twitter.com/michael_shiloh…
|
||
|
|
||
|
No Fee Science
@NoFee_Science
|
1. velj |
|
"This is why preprints can be bad"
*proceeds to detail something which still systematically happens with peer-reviewed papers.
You gave no argument that applies to preprints but not peer-reviewed yet used it to disparage preprints. Dishonest, unwillingly perhaps, but dishonest
|
||
|
|
||
|
No Fee Science
@NoFee_Science
|
1. velj |
|
Some peer-reviewed papers too. Historically speaking, this has been a much greater problem than anything currently happening with preprints.
@WorldImagining speaking, btw. No insult intended, but your argument holds no specific weight against preprints at all.
|
||
|
|
||
|
No Fee Science
@NoFee_Science
|
1. velj |
|
"The scientific enterprise has accumulated a shameful lag with respect to the democratizing potential [of] the internet... Worse: it actually supports and funds those who are most engaged in the combat against this democratization."
#MarchForBetterScience
forms.gle/Zp3Yk63mEnk47L…
|
||
|
|
||
|
No Fee Science
@NoFee_Science
|
1. velj |
|
Advancing this as an argument to say that pre-prints but not peer-reviewed papers are bad, when several high profile papers have recently been retracted (although, you can be guaranteed, not nearly as many as should have been!) is the absolute height of intellectual dishonesty. twitter.com/michael_shiloh…
|
||
|
|
||
| No Fee Science proslijedio/la je tweet | ||
|
Journal of Trial and Error
@jtrialerror
|
31. sij |
|
"We know that the Journal of Trial and Error is here to stay. Our next step is to make constructive reflection happen. And for that reflection, we need you." Co-founder @vandermeer_rm addresses #HistSci in the last @shells_pebbles essay. twitter.com/shells_pebbles…
|
||
|
|
||
|
No Fee Science
@NoFee_Science
|
31. sij |
|
Ahead of the article on @NoFee_Science, you can now read the manifesto in English:
twitter.com/NoFee_Science/…
|
||
|
|
||