Twitter | Pretraživanje | |
Julie J. Lee 7. ožu
Odgovor korisniku/ci @neuroecology @deworrall92
It depends on the network, and others have done nice stuff on rotation equivariance e.g. :)
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
Adam J Calhoun 8. ožu
Odgovor korisniku/ci @synapticlee @deworrall92
still, it looks like its inference roughly corresponds with mine (except when the 'duck' is upside down - need to do a better job with those priors). We certainly aren't rotationally equivariant!
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
Adrian Hutchins 7. ožu
Odgovor korisniku/ci @neuroecology
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
Ronnie Hughes 9. ožu
It’s been such an intense kind of sociology week that here’s Wittgenstein turning up in my Twitter feed first thing on a Saturday morning? Think I’m still dreaming.
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
Tom Murtha 9. ožu
The only two words I remember from those who did sociology at were phenomenology and ethnomethodology.
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
Michael Shadlen 9. ožu
Odgovor korisniku/ci @neuroecology
The answer is simple: Yes!
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
Alison Niedbalski 8. ožu
Odgovor korisniku/ci @neuroecology @ranilillanjum
But what about when the duckrabbits are going at it like bunnies?
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
Rakesh Bhandari 7. ožu
Odgovor korisniku/ci @neuroecology @sbenthall
Dammit, so which one is it? :)
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
Rakesh Bhandari 7. ožu
Odgovor korisniku/ci @neuroecology @sbenthall
We can't easily say it's both because they're incompatible with each other. But to then say that it is neither a duck nor a rabbit misses something, as either interpretation of the black &white dots is an adequate interpretation. Aristotle's logic replaced by a logic of ambiguity
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"