Twitter | Pretraživanje | |
Neuroskeptic
Neuroscience, psychology and psychiatry through a skeptical lens. Just a brain with some eyes. Blogs for .
38.772
Tweetovi
363
Pratim
176.312
Osobe koje vas prate
Tweetovi
Neuroskeptic 5 h
Would it be easier to do a brain transplant OR put a brain in a robot body? I think the latter. We can already implant electrodes into a brain but fusing a brain with another nervous system is sci-fi.
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
Neuroskeptic proslijedio/la je tweet
Stuart Ritchie 1. velj
Two investigations both found that this high-powered genetics prof ran his lab at UCL so "recklessly" that it produced potentially dozens of fraudulent papers (even if he himself didn't commit the fraud). He's taking zero responsibility. Jolly good then!
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
Neuroskeptic 4. velj
Odgovor korisniku/ci @RealUrso
Kuru burger
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
Neuroskeptic 4. velj
Odgovor korisniku/ci @n_equals_42
Cerebdumb
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
Neuroskeptic 4. velj
Offensive slurs for insulting brains: Skulljelly. Grey white and goo. Headstuffer. Spinehat.
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
Neuroskeptic proslijedio/la je tweet
Alex Naka 31. sij
Prefrontal state fluctuations control access to consciousness
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
Neuroskeptic proslijedio/la je tweet
Adam J Calhoun 30. sij
Expert programmers have fine-tuned cortical representations of source code
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
Neuroskeptic proslijedio/la je tweet
bioRxiv Neuroscience 1. velj
Two dominant brain states reflect optimal and suboptimal attention
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
Neuroskeptic 1. velj
Are Scientists Biased Against Christians? Exploring Real and Perceived Bias Against Christians in Academic Biology
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
Neuroskeptic 31. sij
Why did the growth rate of scientific publications stall 2016-2018? New post!
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
Neuroskeptic 31. sij
Psychologists' Psychologies of Psychologists in a Time of Crisis That's a lot of psychologi*s
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
Neuroskeptic 31. sij
"The presence of the filler 'um' in speech is useful in the identification of true versus false oral statements." According to analysis of TV Show "Would I Lie to You?"
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
Neuroskeptic proslijedio/la je tweet
OHBMX 30. sij
Hello WORLD! Join us on the vernal equinox for the OHBM Equinox Twitter Conference: 24hrs tweet talks and keynotes from neuroscientists around the world under the hashtag . Read more at
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
Neuroskeptic proslijedio/la je tweet
Dalmeet Singh Chawla 30. sij
., a site that allows researchers to claim credit for manuscript peer review, has expanded its remit to grant peer review. My latest for :
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
Neuroskeptic proslijedio/la je tweet
Retraction Watch 29. sij
Neither a perceived lack of eminence nor not being a scientist should ever stop anyone from pointing out an error. And if anyone fears retribution, there is always for anonymous comments.
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
Neuroskeptic 30. sij
I'm quoted in a book called "Peter Watts Is An Angry Sentient Tumor"
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
Neuroskeptic 30. sij
Odgovor korisniku/ci @SmutClyde
I guess you could call that... a web of lies
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
Neuroskeptic proslijedio/la je tweet
Smut Clyde, X-Ray Haruspex 30. sij
Odgovor korisniku/ci @Neuro_Skeptic
In related news, the research field of spider social behaviour & leadership turns out to contain more drama than one might have expected.
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
Neuroskeptic 29. sij
"Performing in front of thousands of people every night [Bieber's] dopamine levels were intrinsically altered." Neuro-celebrity-nonsense
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
Neuroskeptic 29. sij
Odgovor korisniku/ci @glopesdev @neuroetho
Yes, the title is very odd
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"