Twitter | Pretraživanje | |
Mark Z. Jacobson
"Next time some paid liar in the fossil fuel industry insists fracked gas is helping solve the climate crisis, remind them a single fracking site 'leaked more methane in 20 days than all but 3 European nations over an entire year"
New data about the 2018 incident sparks fresh warnings about the dangers of natural gas and renewed calls for a rapid transition to renewable energy.
Common Dreams Common Dreams @commondreams
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se" More
Kiyomizu_1971 18. pro
Odgovor korisniku/ci @mzjacobson @BrianVad i 5 ostali
When are people taking ExxonMobil to court?
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
Kiyomizu_1971 18. pro
Odgovor korisniku/ci @mzjacobson @BrianVad i 5 ostali
The only way to stop pollution is to put oil and gas companies out of business. Litigate everywhere for their gross safety violations (broadly defined as endangering humanity)
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
Dano 18. pro
Odgovor korisniku/ci @mzjacobson @LetsFishSmarter i 2 ostali
Fracking needs to be banned, at least Quebec did the right thing and banned it.
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
Kevin Leahy 18. pro
Odgovor korisniku/ci @mzjacobson @exxonmobil @commondreams
Honest question: did the warming potential of the leaked methane exceed, let’s say, 70% of the reduction in emissions from coal use in the US power sector? Cause that’s really the more valid comparison.
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
Nicholas Pevzner 20. pro
Odgovor korisniku/ci @mzjacobson @exxonmobil @commondreams
What is it with all the half-life of methane stats? Methane is between 84 - 105 times more potent than CO2 over a 20-year timeframe, and yes it breaks down over time, but even over a 100-year timeframe it’s 25x worse than CO2. And we’re running out of CO2 budget within the decade
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
Mike Koob 18. pro
Odgovor korisniku/ci @mzjacobson @exxonmobil i 3 ostali
The and the reported this disaster today too.
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
Clifford Sosin 18. pro
Odgovor korisniku/ci @mzjacobson @ProfTimNoakes i 2 ostali
Doesn’t methane have an atmospheric half life of 7 yrs? So the methane leak would have a transient impact no? But any CO2 reductions would have a much longer half life no?
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
Pirana 18. pro
Odgovor korisniku/ci @mzjacobson @grammy_linen i 2 ostali
😥😥😥😡😡😡🤬🤬🤬🤬!
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
Mgalimany 🎗🇧🇪🇨🇰🇨🇭🇦🇺🇩🇪🏴󠁧󠁢󠁳󠁣󠁴󠁿 18. pro
Odgovor korisniku/ci @mzjacobson @facts_tesla i 2 ostali
Improve security in this installations, add a plan B in case something goes wrong, if they cannot control, that means that needs to be banned. A carbon ticket fee should be mandatory for this companies, this is the way they understand, affecting the budget. is urgent.
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
George Spencer 19. pro
Odgovor korisniku/ci @mzjacobson @xRebelCanada i 2 ostali
The only reason reported methane leaks are suddenly getting bigger is because the public has access to independent data which can challenge under reported numbers published by offending energy corps and complicit gov't regulators.
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"