Twitter | Search | |
Min
No central bank/company/blockchain project would(or should) claim that [insert action] would add value to its currency/shares/tokens.
Reply Retweet Like More
Student of the Game 29 Nov 18
Replying to @minhokim
What about transactions on their network? This seems like a viable reason given the token economic structure of many coins, including ICON. In my opinion it’s the most sound and fundamental economic structure since a majority of these blockchains are networks for development.
Reply Retweet Like
Min 30 Nov 18
Replying to @RSCHR777
Yes I can have a discussion on the general token economics. I can even publicly talk token prices where I do not have any conflict of interests. My point is that all insiders cannot esp. for any particular action or event (e.g. How does this partnership add value for ICX?)
Reply Retweet Like
BittBurger 29 Nov 18
Replying to @minhokim
Adhering to the roadmap, and meeting deadlines is how a block chain project sustains it’s token value. We should try it :)
Reply Retweet Like
Meros Wilde 29 Nov 18
Replying to @minhokim
Reply Retweet Like
smartonosen 3 Dec 18
Replying to @minhokim
Reply Retweet Like