Tweetovi

	Michael Kreil proslijedio/la je tweet
	max czollek @rubenmcloop	2. velj
	Mal was schönes aufn Sonntag: die Ächtung der AfD funktioniert! Schreibt @VerenaWeidenba1 auf @zeitonline Jetzt bloß nicht nachgeben! Weitermachen und @HasnainKazim und alle die anderen supporten, die die Punches kassieren. zeit.de/kultur/2019-11…
	Prikaz sažetka ·

	Michael Kreil @MichaelKreil	3. velj
	Odgovor korisniku/ci @moylato @Benj_Ray @iainoverton What if we are dealing with an international, xenophobic, right-wing movement that we ignore because we believe that AI-controlled social bots that brainwash people are more plausible?
	Prikaz razgovora ·

	Michael Kreil @MichaelKreil	3. velj
	Odgovor korisniku/ci @moylato @Benj_Ray @iainoverton I know people who are convinced that only Trump/Brexit/AfD can save their country. They become active in every major election or public debate. These people are no bots, no trolls, no russian sock puppets, but people who seem to base their worldview on Fox News/Bild/tabloids/…
	Prikaz razgovora ·

	Michael Kreil @MichaelKreil	2. velj
	Odgovor korisniku/ci @whrde It’s ISO. It works everywhere.
	Prikaz razgovora ·

	Michael Kreil @MichaelKreil	2. velj
	2020-02-02
	Prikaži podatke ·

	Michael Kreil @MichaelKreil	1. velj
	Odgovor korisniku/ci @Frau_Beckedahl @EliyahHavemann Somebody needs my help... Nananananana Botman /o/
	Prikaz razgovora ·

	Michael Kreil @MichaelKreil	31. sij
	Ciao, au revoir und machts gut. #brexit
	Prikaži podatke ·

	Michael Kreil @MichaelKreil	29. sij
	Odgovor korisniku/ci @jonathanstray @metaviv Once the scientists detected these bots, they could retrieve all their tweets, analyze very deeply how they manipulate people and assess the actual impact. Problem solved. But nobody actually did this … except for counting the hashtags. I wonder why. 🤨
	Prikaz razgovora ·

	Michael Kreil @MichaelKreil	29. sij
	Odgovor korisniku/ci @jonathanstray @metaviv I love papers with e.g. GitHub repos or Jupyter notebooks. 😍
	Prikaz razgovora ·

	Michael Kreil @MichaelKreil	29. sij
	Odgovor korisniku/ci @metaviv @jonathanstray This does not change the fact that research groups are unable to find them down and instead mistakenly classify people as bots. But ... can I talk to your source?
	Prikaz razgovora ·

	Michael Kreil @MichaelKreil	29. sij
	Odgovor korisniku/ci @MrBeagleman @Kronykal Thanks! Source?
	Prikaz razgovora ·

	Michael Kreil @MichaelKreil	29. sij
	Odgovor korisniku/ci @MrBeagleman @Kronykal I only used data from the official Twitter API. What do you mean by „demographics“?
	Prikaz razgovora ·

	Michael Kreil @MichaelKreil	29. sij
	Odgovor korisniku/ci @CSorabji @meyer_resende Of course. Especially during the US elections and the UK referendum there were a lot of highly active people fighting on all platforms. They fought for/against Trump or for/against Brexit. That was highly emotional. Of course they reached over 50 Tweets/day.
	Prikaz razgovora ·

	Michael Kreil @MichaelKreil	29. sij
	Odgovor korisniku/ci @IMCYAAL @polbots @ggreenwald I tried to reproduce the results and couldn’t find these thousands of Bots. I can only reach their numbers if I count every tweet. That’s suspicious.
	Prikaz razgovora ·

	Michael Kreil @MichaelKreil	28. sij
	Odgovor korisniku/ci @pkreissel @meyer_resende Okay, I think I'm gonna have to disagree with you. In particular, social problems are projected onto social media. I have a lot of arguments on this. Maybe we can settle this over a coffee/beer sometime?
	Prikaz razgovora ·

	Michael Kreil @MichaelKreil	28. sij
	Odgovor korisniku/ci @pkreissel @meyer_resende Then please refute this with evidence, not with unproven claims.
	Prikaz razgovora ·

	Michael Kreil @MichaelKreil	28. sij
	Odgovor korisniku/ci @pkreissel @meyer_resende But these were not social bots or Russian sock puppets. They were right-wing people who are convinced of a media conspiracy and they distort many public discussions. Why the hell are we still talking about social bots?
	Prikaz razgovora ·

	Michael Kreil @MichaelKreil	28. sij
	Odgovor korisniku/ci @josh_emerson Could you be so kind and rank the following possible factors based on their actual influence on the election results? - Trolls on Twitter - Clinton was a bad candidate - 2016 DNC e-mail leak - Gerrymandering - Racism and Islamophobia as mass phenomenon in the US - Fox News
	Prikaz razgovora ·

	Michael Kreil @MichaelKreil	28. sij
	Odgovor korisniku/ci @josh_emerson True, but have trolls on Twitter influenced the election results?
	Prikaz razgovora ·

	Michael Kreil @MichaelKreil	28. sij
	Odgovor korisniku/ci @pkreissel @meyer_resende Theoretically, yes. Probably with minimal effect. But almost every scientific study on social bots did not examine fake followers, likes and retweets, but rather accounts that can automagically generate texts of their own to change political views.
	Prikaz razgovora ·