Twitter | Pretraživanje | |
michael_nielsen
Of course, in 1992 it was reasonable publishers hadn't yet figured out new business models. Nowadays, things have changed s'what, due to the work by open access & science advocates, but scientific publishing is still slow-moving for reasons described here:
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se" More
adjoint +/- norm 2. velj
Odgovor korisniku/ci @michael_nielsen
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
🎷🦨 2. velj
Odgovor korisniku/ci @adamnemecek1 @michael_nielsen
I think the problem is more social than this. I actually tried starting a startup like this but stopped due to negative early feedback. Scientists want to publish in prestigious journals and are weary of something like this. Authorea already exists but isn't being adopted much.
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"