|
@michael_nielsen | |||||
|
Of course, in 1992 it was reasonable publishers hadn't yet figured out new business models. Nowadays, things have changed s'what, due to the work by open access & science advocates, but scientific publishing is still slow-moving for reasons described here: twitter.com/michael_nielse…
|
||||||
|
||||||
|
michael_nielsen
@michael_nielsen
|
2. velj |
|
(ht Scott Aaronson) pic.twitter.com/Ul7ql77ipY
|
||
|
|
||
|
adjoint +/- norm
@adamnemecek1
|
2. velj |
|
|
||
|
🎷🦨
@bohmian_rhapsdy
|
2. velj |
|
I think the problem is more social than this. I actually tried starting a startup like this but stopped due to negative early feedback. Scientists want to publish in prestigious journals and are weary of something like this. Authorea already exists but isn't being adopted much.
|
||
|
|
||