|
@michael_nielsen | |||||
|
(ht Scott Aaronson) pic.twitter.com/Ul7ql77ipY
|
||||||
|
||||||
|
michael_nielsen
@michael_nielsen
|
2. velj |
|
Of course, in 1992 it was reasonable publishers hadn't yet figured out new business models. Nowadays, things have changed s'what, due to the work by open access & science advocates, but scientific publishing is still slow-moving for reasons described here: twitter.com/michael_nielse…
|
||
|
|
||
|
Jeffrey Ladish
@JeffLadish
|
2. velj |
|
Seems fine in 2020. Free PDF available when googled. Probably wasn't the case in 1992. pic.twitter.com/DPRvg7iAu5
|
||
|
|
||
|
Periperi • DNC Chair
@AgiaTheBun
|
2. velj |
|
Irony
|
||
|
|
||
|
Jacob Martinson
@jrmartinson_
|
2. velj |
|
Do they address the quality of writing? Like, it's easy to write off some inaccessibility to the complexity of science, but a lot of papers somehow get published with just basic editing problems, like being unable to tell where someone's quote ends and their analysis starts.
|
||
|
|
||
|
George Stockbridge
@GStockbridge100
|
2. velj |
|
This is so annoying when I’m trying to research as a student
|
||
|
|
||
|
Karthik Sridhar
@AntarYaami
|
2. velj |
|
OMG DED
|
||
|
|
||
|
doug orr
@doug_boh
|
2. velj |
|
Yeeeah, the problem with the whole "training" and "we'll spread tech around to underdeveloped economic areas" thing.
(A) fordism is, regrettably, dead
(B) get behind and it's hard to catch up because the future is accelerating away from us
|
||
|
|
||
|
John Sigmon
@JohnSigmon
|
2. velj |
|
I wish Scott Aaronson was on Twitter :(
|
||
|
|
||
|
shale
@logicregressor
|
2. velj |
|
Same tweet?
twitter.com/tanfad/status/…
|
||
|
|
||