Twitter | Pretraživanje | |
Matthew Holehouse
Senior correspondent, MLex. Get in touch: holehouse@mlex.com
22.177
Tweetovi
4.171
Pratim
23.826
Osobe koje vas prate
Tweetovi
Matthew Holehouse 26 min
Odgovor korisniku/ci @tompeck
All a game and one the British government has played very well for many years
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
Matthew Holehouse 33 min
Estonian government advert, Westminster tube station
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
Matthew Holehouse 21 h
Odgovor korisniku/ci @TomMcTague @stephenkb @JeremyCliffe
Truth is the Commission couldn't apply EU law beyond its borders without CJEU as the ultimate authority, even if it wanted to, because when it has tried in the past the court has nixed the treaty. Lots of precedents, but always cases of neighbours that have sought integration
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
Matthew Holehouse 21 h
The Dover problem: UK will seek "equivalence provisions" with the EU's SPS regime to reduce checks at the border.
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
Matthew Holehouse 22 h
UK's WMS. A real gulf on level playing field. And yet much on the same page on form, content and expectations. Nothing like the almost existential differences that plagued May/Juncker negotiations: on what to do in two years, NI, Chequers and so on.
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
Matthew Holehouse 22 h
"Exactly the same regulatory frameworks at the point of exit." This, apparently, is not "alignment".
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
Matthew Holehouse 23 h
Odgovor korisniku/ci @CifrLXXXVI @pmdfoster
yes. good one.
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
Matthew Holehouse 23 h
Odgovor korisniku/ci @mattholehouse
... in exchange for nothing by way market access. e.g. UK is already obliged to protect EU citizens' pre-Brexit data in line with EU law, but doesn't necessarily get continued data flows via an adequacy decision. Lots of bathwater and no baby.
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
Matthew Holehouse 23 h
The problem for UKis so many sticking points are already swallowed by the UK under the WA: UK-wide state aid; CJEU (Northern Ireland, citizens rights (8 years), financial settlement (c50 years)); GDPR for deposited data; safeguard measures. Positions pretty well overrun...
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
Matthew Holehouse 23 h
Odgovor korisniku/ci @JamesCrisp6
I'm a contrarian but I don't buy the argument that fisheries being linked to other areas is necessarily against the UK's interests, unless you think it shouldn't be used as a bargaining chip at all, which would be a bit self-defeating
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
Matthew Holehouse 24 h
PM says UK has seen just four adverse state aid decisions in recent decades, compared to dozens each for France, Germany and Italy. "Who's undercutting?" he asks.
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
Matthew Holehouse 24 h
the PM sticks to the Liam Fox rule of citing Adam Smith and David Ricardo, and only Adam Smith and David Ricardo, in a speech on trade.
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
Matthew Holehouse 3. velj
Odgovor korisniku/ci @mattholehouse
From the EU mandate: specific LPF provisions for aviation in addition to the general provisions of the agreement (because the sector is highly competitive, sensitive to distortions and by definition cross border). Not a freebie...
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
Matthew Holehouse 3. velj
A plan for the UK to reject LPF in state aid, competition, labour law but walk away with an “Australian” aviation agreement might not stack up. EU’s position has always been they are strictly linked, inc under the no deal contingency plan.
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
Matthew Holehouse 2. velj
Odgovor korisniku/ci @mattholehouse
*or rather, disappearance as a 'hub' for purpose of legal footprint in the EU, not real-world activity
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
Matthew Holehouse 2. velj
Odgovor korisniku/ci @mattholehouse
This was and still is a great piece.. on the race to up UK content for carmakers:
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
Matthew Holehouse 2. velj
The idea Brexit will compel some to increase their UK footprint is pretty baked in (for reasons of regulatory barriers as well as tariffs) as we set out here: Q is: does it compensate for UK's disappearance as an EU hub; what's the hit to competition
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
Matthew Holehouse 2. velj
The Brexit fashion for all things Australian is fascinating, and much deeper than sunshine, Five Eyes and Canzuk; but once the major emigration destination for Brits of a certain age, driven by the same malaise that would push Britain into the EEC.
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
Matthew Holehouse 2. velj
Odgovor korisniku/ci @BrunoBrussels
Indeed my memory is the telegraph quite wisely didn’t endorse until four days before the vote, and happily ran interventions from both sides, inc Obama. Readership in a different place back then
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
Matthew Holehouse 2. velj
Odgovor korisniku/ci @joncstone
It is almost as if after 10 months of binary debate about Yes/No ECJ, some sort of satisfactory hybrid will be struck upon at the eleventh hour
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"