Twitter | Search | |
mark richard harris πŸ‡¬πŸ‡§πŸ‡ͺπŸ‡ΊπŸ‡¨πŸ‡Ώ
in the middle on most things. Views are my own.
4,697
Tweets
853
Following
47
Followers
Tweets
mark richard harris πŸ‡¬πŸ‡§πŸ‡ͺπŸ‡ΊπŸ‡¨πŸ‡Ώ 2h
Replying to @EarlyOakR @CeeMacBee
Has anyone worked out the actual tariff payments on net Β£94 billion goods deficit with the EU on WTO terms?
Reply Retweet Like
mark richard harris πŸ‡¬πŸ‡§πŸ‡ͺπŸ‡ΊπŸ‡¨πŸ‡Ώ 2h
Replying to @ReutersBiz
Clearly the EU firms will need continued access to the city ecosystem after brexit (assuming no financial services deal)
Reply Retweet Like
mark richard harris πŸ‡¬πŸ‡§πŸ‡ͺπŸ‡ΊπŸ‡¨πŸ‡Ώ 3h
Same result.
Reply Retweet Like
mark richard harris πŸ‡¬πŸ‡§πŸ‡ͺπŸ‡ΊπŸ‡¨πŸ‡Ώ 4h
Replying to @andrew_lilico
β€˜Managed no deal’ was the phrase
Reply Retweet Like
mark richard harris πŸ‡¬πŸ‡§πŸ‡ͺπŸ‡ΊπŸ‡¨πŸ‡Ώ 15h
Replying to @FabianZuleeg
UK can of course accept non regression clauses, as have Japan and Canada. What it can’t accept is dynamic alignment, for Canada level access.
Reply Retweet Like
mark richard harris πŸ‡¬πŸ‡§πŸ‡ͺπŸ‡ΊπŸ‡¨πŸ‡Ώ 15h
Replying to @RAF_IFA
That’s all right then.
Reply Retweet Like
mark richard harris πŸ‡¬πŸ‡§πŸ‡ͺπŸ‡ΊπŸ‡¨πŸ‡Ώ 16h
Replying to @r0g3rd4y
Compare and contrast with the Meghan racism story
Reply Retweet Like
mark richard harris πŸ‡¬πŸ‡§πŸ‡ͺπŸ‡ΊπŸ‡¨πŸ‡Ώ 16h
Replying to @BrexitAlex
Never good when the referee becomes the story of the game
Reply Retweet Like
mark richard harris πŸ‡¬πŸ‡§πŸ‡ͺπŸ‡ΊπŸ‡¨πŸ‡Ώ 17h
Replying to @JohnOBrennan2
Sherry tariffs now increased by 100%
Reply Retweet Like
mark richard harris πŸ‡¬πŸ‡§πŸ‡ͺπŸ‡ΊπŸ‡¨πŸ‡Ώ Jan 18
Replying to @Uigeach1
How does Norway manage?
Reply Retweet Like
mark richard harris πŸ‡¬πŸ‡§πŸ‡ͺπŸ‡ΊπŸ‡¨πŸ‡Ώ Jan 18
UK doesn’t have to follow the same rules for equivalence but ensure own rules result in same outcomes. In many cases UK rules such as bank capital are higher than EU.
Reply Retweet Like
mark richard harris πŸ‡¬πŸ‡§πŸ‡ͺπŸ‡ΊπŸ‡¨πŸ‡Ώ Jan 18
Would the EU demand this if Russia, a large, close economy, started negotiating an FTA? Methinks not
Reply Retweet Like
mark richard harris πŸ‡¬πŸ‡§πŸ‡ͺπŸ‡ΊπŸ‡¨πŸ‡Ώ Jan 18
By Adrian Mole 13 and 3/4
Reply Retweet Like
mark richard harris πŸ‡¬πŸ‡§πŸ‡ͺπŸ‡ΊπŸ‡¨πŸ‡Ώ Jan 18
Replying to @jimeekay @pernilleru
Thanks for backing up what I have been saying β˜οΈπŸ˜„
Reply Retweet Like
mark richard harris πŸ‡¬πŸ‡§πŸ‡ͺπŸ‡ΊπŸ‡¨πŸ‡Ώ Jan 18
Madness when you think of it Bryan. The EU has demanded part of a country stays in its customs area in perpetuity (perhaps) without representation. Democratically it can never work.
Reply Retweet Like
mark richard harris πŸ‡¬πŸ‡§πŸ‡ͺπŸ‡ΊπŸ‡¨πŸ‡Ώ Jan 18
Replying to @JohnOBrennan2
If Russia, being a large and close economy, wanted an FTA, would the EU be pushing for the same level of control?
Reply Retweet Like
mark richard harris πŸ‡¬πŸ‡§πŸ‡ͺπŸ‡ΊπŸ‡¨πŸ‡Ώ Jan 18
I did read it but trying to understand it...
Reply Retweet Like
mark richard harris πŸ‡¬πŸ‡§πŸ‡ͺπŸ‡ΊπŸ‡¨πŸ‡Ώ Jan 18
Replying to @jimeekay @pernilleru
Saying there are no benefits cannot be taken as a fact with so many variables. It’s almost as impossible to forecast as a horse race. Eg. We don’t know what is going to happen to the EU, tomorrow it might be invaded by Russia closing it as a market (v unlikely but a possibility)
Reply Retweet Like
mark richard harris πŸ‡¬πŸ‡§πŸ‡ͺπŸ‡ΊπŸ‡¨πŸ‡Ώ Jan 18
How is this different than before? Today can’t sell a fridge into Ireland with an electric plug that is different to France.
Reply Retweet Like
mark richard harris πŸ‡¬πŸ‡§πŸ‡ͺπŸ‡ΊπŸ‡¨πŸ‡Ώ Jan 18
No idea, I am just commenting on the widespread mis-interpretation of the quote
Reply Retweet Like