|
@m_the_cohen | |||||
|
@De_dicto will in fact likely make that point, and it's certainly not unreasonable in my mind. Though I just don't know if we can ever generalize no cognition papers more broadly to different paradigms
|
||||||
|
||||||
|
Michael Cohen
@m_the_cohen
|
29. sij |
|
VERY important paper from Logothetis' group just posted on @biorxivpreprint about decoding consciousness in PFC in monkeys during a no-report paradigm. VERY critical data for current debates in awareness.
biorxiv.org/content/10.110…
|
||
|
|
||
|
Ian Phillips
@ibphillips
|
29. sij |
|
Impressive stuff. But from a quick look it seems they only deal with "volitional motor report" as a confound not other cognitive processes. So @De_dicto will rightly complain we need a no cognition paradigm.
|
||
|
|
||
|
hakwan lau
@hakwanlau
|
29. sij |
|
Ian, "rightly", really? how about this?
nature.com/articles/natur…
there the animal was attending to another feature, performing at near threshold (meaning it was challenging), yet the irrelevant feature could be decoded just as well.
we already discussed this in Odegaard et al
|
||
|
|
||
|
Ian Phillips
@ibphillips
|
29. sij |
|
My "rightly" was aimed at the Kapoor et al. paper. In Odegaard et al. you consider the worry that "an overtrained animal may still be preparing a report". But even if Mante et al. address that, cognition includes more than report prep. so decoding could still reflect that, no?
|
||
|
|
||
|
Ned Block
@De_dicto
|
29. sij |
|
I ALREADY made that point--in the TiCS paper which referenced Kapoor's ASSC talk!
|
||
|
|
||