Twitter | Pretraživanje | |
Leo Polovets
General Partner (seed investor in , ). We invest $1m into $2m+ seed rounds. Prev: , 2nd eng hire ,
20.390
Tweetovi
528
Pratim
29.533
Osobe koje vas prate
Tweetovi
Leo Polovets 8 h
Odgovor korisniku/ci @zebulgar
This is the real opportunity for your podcast. Record your brother performing ancient rituals: sacrificing goats, making his own dishes out of clay, programming in C, etc.
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
Leo Polovets 8 h
Odgovor korisniku/ci @kunksed @eriktorenberg
Sorry, that sounded like a better joke in my mind.
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
Leo Polovets 8 h
Odgovor korisniku/ci @Artem_Mashkov
You can definitely be the user base you initially target.
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
Leo Polovets 8 h
Odgovor korisniku/ci @kunksed @eriktorenberg
There are tons of good podcasts out there on venture. Twenty Minute VC, Invest like the Best, a16z, Full Ratchet... I'm sure there are others but I can't think of them right now. :)
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
Leo Polovets 8 h
My experience so far: Most co's that try to build platforms end up evolving into tools for their early user base. Some co's that try to build tools for a specific user base eventually evolve into platforms. To build a platform, start w/tools for a set of users then generalize.
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
Leo Polovets 9 h
Odgovor korisniku/ci @eriktorenberg
I wonder if that's because there are way more individual brands today. If you go back ~10 years, the main individual brands were bloggers like Brad and Fred. ~5 years ago it was those folks + early Twitter users. Today so many more people go on podcasts, write posts, tweet, etc.
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
Leo Polovets 9 h
Odgovor korisniku/ci @eriktorenberg
That's interesting. I've observed that as well, although it kind of depends on the firm (some firms have good reps even if individual partners aren't well-known).
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
Leo Polovets 9 h
Odgovor korisniku/ci @eriktorenberg
I have a vested interest, but this feels like Party Rounds 2.0 to me. Party rounds work pretty well when a startup ends up having a great trajectory, but not so much when it doesn't.
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
Leo Polovets 14 h
The 5-year chart is insane.
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
Leo Polovets 15 h
Odgovor korisniku/ci @micahjay1
I disagree. 😁
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
Leo Polovets 19 h
Odgovor korisniku/ci @BrentBeshore @PermanentEquity
I love that this happens to be a pun on the PE acronym. "We're a different kind of PE fund." 🎯👍
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
Leo Polovets 3. velj
Odgovor korisniku/ci @edtaussig
Not so much fail as plateau much sooner. See:
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
Leo Polovets 3. velj
Odgovor korisniku/ci @mitali
IMHO value should be looked at from the ecosystem's perpsective, not the user's. That value rose dramatically. Google's revenue grew by ~$100b in last 5 yrs (!), and if you assume advertisers get 3x ROI on their ads, that means companies buying ads got ~$200b in additional value.
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
Leo Polovets 3. velj
Odgovor korisniku/ci @f_j_j_ @peteflint
Thanks for the note! 's article is great.
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
Leo Polovets 3. velj
Odgovor korisniku/ci @harmonylion1 @tomaspueyo
Re #2 -- I agree (though I don't think billionaires are to blame, nor should they be the only ones who pitch in.) Re #3 -- this is what Warren's and Bernie's wealth taxes are proposing. See:
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
Leo Polovets 3. velj
Odgovor korisniku/ci @rosalindbordo
I can definitely see why this is a contentious topic, but otoh just because a lot of people think something doesn't mean they are right.
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
Leo Polovets 3. velj
Odgovor korisniku/ci @tomaspueyo
1) who are any of us to decide what suffices *for someone else*? If you ask a homeless person, they might suggest $50k suffices. 2) I'd argue lots of billionaires are better at deploying their billions than the govt would be. 3) Most of this is illiquid assets & not cash.
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
Leo Polovets 3. velj
Odgovor korisniku/ci @zachcoelius @paul_arnold
💯
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
Leo Polovets 3. velj
Odgovor korisniku/ci @paul_arnold @zachcoelius
It's a spectrum, & a higher marginal % would be more disincentive than today but less than 100% marginal tax. That said, IMO public spending is much less efficient than private spending in most areas, so I don't want higher taxes because I think the govt will mostly waste the $.
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
Leo Polovets 3. velj
Odgovor korisniku/ci @mchapiro
Just replying to the prompt. 🤷‍♂️
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"