Twitter | Pretraživanje | |
Daniel Litt
Assistant Professor of mathematics at UGA. Algebraic geometry, number theory, etc. He/him.
1.043
Tweetovi
548
Pratim
2.022
Osobe koje vas prate
Tweetovi
Daniel Litt 5 h
Odgovor korisniku/ci @hartkp @virtualcourtney
Counting points on some varieties over finite fields!
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
Daniel Litt 15 h
And the (incredible) Corlette-Simpson correspondence (that is, non-Abelian Hodge theory)!
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
Daniel Litt 17 h
Odgovor korisniku/ci @koszuldude
Is there a new one?
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
Daniel Litt 23 h
Odgovor korisniku/ci @mathemensch
Yeah, this is definitely not surprising :).
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
Daniel Litt 23 h
One cool consequence of this is that is Turing-complete!
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
Daniel Litt 6. velj
Odgovor korisniku/ci @PuzzleScript
This was mostly an excuse for me to learn -- which was a lot of fun!
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
Daniel Litt 6. velj
Odgovor korisniku/ci @PuzzleScript
I made a little toy using that lets you do so:
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
Daniel Litt 6. velj
Have you ever wanted to play with Wolfram's cellular automata?
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
Daniel Litt 5. velj
Odgovor korisniku/ci @aacooper @TChihMath
Just rotate those direct sums 45 degrees — nobody will notice...
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
Daniel Litt 4. velj
Odgovor korisniku/ci @aacooper @TChihMath
This gives me the shakes -- these aren't morphisms in the category of vector spaces!
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
Daniel Litt 4. velj
It was a really great talk!
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
Daniel Litt 4. velj
Presumably e^{ijk} means e_i\wedge e_j\wedge e_k.
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
Daniel Litt 4. velj
Odgovor korisniku/ci @zacharyabel
Really great! (And really hard!)
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
Daniel Litt proslijedio/la je tweet
Zachary Abel 4. velj
I made a (very challenging) puzzle game, Bottom Feeder! It's about snakes eating pellets with their, uh, tails.
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
Daniel Litt 4. velj
Odgovor korisniku/ci @AndrewM_Webb @EgbertRijke
Ah right! Missed this crucial fact :)
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
Daniel Litt 4. velj
Odgovor korisniku/ci @AndrewM_Webb @EgbertRijke
No, suppose they don’t find their name and they finish their cycle in 10 steps. Your strategy just has them continue looping around the cycle 5 times!
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
Daniel Litt 4. velj
Odgovor korisniku/ci @AndrewM_Webb @EgbertRijke
Suppose a prisoner finishes their cycle after less than 50 boxes. Can’t one evidently improve the strategy by having them start on the next cycle? It seems to me that this strategy is obviously not optimal!
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
Daniel Litt 3. velj
The distinction you draw between machinery and truth is interesting — it suggests to me that the argument here derives from a real philosophical difference, which might be worth making explicit.
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
Daniel Litt 3. velj
Even in this trivial case, it’s been my experience that this kind of ambiguity can confuse students.
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
Daniel Litt 3. velj
Your choice is to disambiguate “only when it matters,” which requires you to anticipate your audience in a way which may not be possible, or to just get in the habit of disambiguating in general, which has the side benefit of improving the clarity of your writing imo.
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"