|
@lakens | |||||
|
General Notice: Saying 'solving X will do nothing to solve Y' is not an argument against solving X, and without a solid cost-benefit analysis based on reasonable parameters and a widely accepted utility function it is also not an argument to solve Y before solving X.
|
||||||
|
||||||
|
Pradeep Reddy
@raamana_
|
9. sij |
|
in my bubble, this sort of discussion happens because people often claim (in grant applications etc) that "solving X (some basic stats on brain data) will solve Y (biomarkers for complex disease D)", whence it is fair to discourage any type of X that's clearly not connected Y!
|
||
|
||