Twitter | Pretraživanje | |
Laban Sköllermark
Interested in information and IT security. Occational CTF player for . Systems Specialist at Verisure Innovation AB. Opinions are mine.
672
Tweetovi
160
Pratim
122
Osobe koje vas prate
Tweetovi
Laban Sköllermark 1. velj
Odgovor korisniku/ci @arturo182 @Raspberry_Pi
No nibbles either?
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
Laban Sköllermark 30. sij
Odgovor korisniku/ci @cstromblad @JohanGrufman @stiftelsen
Lite som Särimner fast tvärtom? ;) Eventuellt skulle det kunna bli ett projekt med bidrag från ?
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
Laban Sköllermark 29. sij
Odgovor korisniku/ci @JohanRMoller
It's a sign that your body wants vacation!
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
Laban Sköllermark 28. sij
Odgovor korisniku/ci @teirdes @sakerhetssnack
Bra jobbat! Väl påläst som vanligt! En fröjd att lyssna på.
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
Laban Sköllermark 28. sij
Odgovor korisniku/ci @trebbelito
Hmm. Corona already contains alcohol so I don't buy that. People should start rub hands with lime instead...
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
Laban Sköllermark 28. sij
Odgovor korisniku/ci @shehackspurple
Is there a fixed list of what HTTP response headers are considered "security headers"? This site include cache headers for instance:
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
Laban Sköllermark 28. sij
Odgovor korisniku/ci @shehackspurple
And what is "code"? What languages? You want to include PHP I assume. Of course it's possible to find/create a language where you can't set any HTTP response headers at all.
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
Laban Sköllermark 28. sij
Odgovor korisniku/ci @shehackspurple
"It depends" I guess. Is "server" the software terminating TLS? What web servers do you want to cover? Even those like HAProxy? What about "apps" that implement the HTTP Server itself, like what's possible in Python and Go? Then "server" == "code" as someone pointed out.
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
Laban Sköllermark 26. sij
Odgovor korisniku/ci @patriklu
Eller "No invitation necessary" för den delen...
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
Laban Sköllermark proslijedio/la je tweet
Lina 25. sij
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
Laban Sköllermark 17. sij
Odgovor korisniku/ci @Kuggofficial
Kommer de läsa i hemlighet från /dev/hda bara? Lätt att kringgå! ;)
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
Laban Sköllermark proslijedio/la je tweet
ᴉpᴉǝH 🐐💕 16. sij
How did the hackers get away? They ransomeware.
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
Laban Sköllermark 17. sij
Odgovor korisniku/ci @bagder
Ah! Yeah that will override whatever comes from http(s)_proxy environment variable I assume. Thanks!
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
Laban Sköllermark 17. sij
Odgovor korisniku/ci @bagder
The (strange) option for *not* using a proxy. --noproxy '*'
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
Laban Sköllermark proslijedio/la je tweet
Thomas 🐦 16. sij
If you DON’T give your new vulnerability a spicy name, everyone else will try to do it for you, and 2 years from now nobody will remember if “Chain Of Fools” is the same bug as “CurveBall” or “Who’s Curve”. The lesson is obvious.
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
Laban Sköllermark 16. sij
Odgovor korisniku/ci @SwiftOnSecurity
Another suggestion seems to be .
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
Laban Sköllermark 16. sij
Odgovor korisniku/ci @SwiftOnSecurity
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
Laban Sköllermark 15. sij
Odgovor korisniku/ci @PontusFalk @signalapp
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
Laban Sköllermark 15. sij
Odgovor korisniku/ci @QubesOS
This sentence seems incomplete: "Since the bug would have presented installation problems for the majority of users."
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
Laban Sköllermark 14. sij
Odgovor korisniku/ci @SwiftOnSecurity
0601? Oh, it's the one NSA warned about. Where's the name and the logo? NSA usually come up with code names for stuff and sometimes clever or funny. Not in this case?
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"