Twitter | PretraΕΎivanje | |
KordingLab πŸ‘¨β€πŸ’»πŸ§ βˆ‡πŸ”¬πŸ“ˆ,πŸ‹οΈβ€β™‚οΈβ›·οΈπŸ‚πŸ›ΉπŸ•Ίβ›°οΈβ˜•πŸ¦–
Prof, in brains, for brains and . Physicist. Collaborator. Transdisciplinary optimist. Dad. Loves outdoors. πŸ¦–
10.847
Tweetovi
2.397
Pratim
14.853
Osobe koje vas prate
Tweetovi
KordingLab πŸ‘¨β€πŸ’»πŸ§ βˆ‡πŸ”¬πŸ“ˆ,πŸ‹οΈβ€β™‚οΈβ›·οΈπŸ‚πŸ›ΉπŸ•Ίβ›°οΈβ˜•πŸ¦– 3 h
Odgovor korisniku/ci @oskurovic @nicholdav
Yes. That's ok.
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviΔ‘a mi se"
KordingLab πŸ‘¨β€πŸ’»πŸ§ βˆ‡πŸ”¬πŸ“ˆ,πŸ‹οΈβ€β™‚οΈβ›·οΈπŸ‚πŸ›ΉπŸ•Ίβ›°οΈβ˜•πŸ¦– 10 h
Odgovor korisniku/ci @GunnarBlohm @BMI_WesternU
But will there be Vikings?
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviΔ‘a mi se"
KordingLab πŸ‘¨β€πŸ’»πŸ§ βˆ‡πŸ”¬πŸ“ˆ,πŸ‹οΈβ€β™‚οΈβ›·οΈπŸ‚πŸ›ΉπŸ•Ίβ›°οΈβ˜•πŸ¦– proslijedio/la je tweet
Russ Poldrack 19 h
How can neuroscientists respond to the climate emergency?
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviΔ‘a mi se"
KordingLab πŸ‘¨β€πŸ’»πŸ§ βˆ‡πŸ”¬πŸ“ˆ,πŸ‹οΈβ€β™‚οΈβ›·οΈπŸ‚πŸ›ΉπŸ•Ίβ›°οΈβ˜•πŸ¦– 11 h
Odgovor korisniku/ci @borna__m
Probably. Although having some link may be good. What is your topic?
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviΔ‘a mi se"
KordingLab πŸ‘¨β€πŸ’»πŸ§ βˆ‡πŸ”¬πŸ“ˆ,πŸ‹οΈβ€β™‚οΈβ›·οΈπŸ‚πŸ›ΉπŸ•Ίβ›°οΈβ˜•πŸ¦– 14 h
Odgovor korisniku/ci @tyrell_turing @graemedmoffat
Yes. Happy to send you details.
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviΔ‘a mi se"
KordingLab πŸ‘¨β€πŸ’»πŸ§ βˆ‡πŸ”¬πŸ“ˆ,πŸ‹οΈβ€β™‚οΈβ›·οΈπŸ‚πŸ›ΉπŸ•Ίβ›°οΈβ˜•πŸ¦– 15 h
Odgovor korisniku/ci @oskurovic @nicholdav
In an online setting I will, on average, have seen half of the testing data. I need far less to deal with certain kinds of covariate drift.
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviΔ‘a mi se"
KordingLab πŸ‘¨β€πŸ’»πŸ§ βˆ‡πŸ”¬πŸ“ˆ,πŸ‹οΈβ€β™‚οΈβ›·οΈπŸ‚πŸ›ΉπŸ•Ίβ›°οΈβ˜•πŸ¦– 17 h
Learn modeling, improve your data science, learn to better answer real questions. Clarity. And improve your python skills too. If you are in the broad sensorimotor field consider attending our Cosmo 2 week summer school.
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviΔ‘a mi se"
KordingLab πŸ‘¨β€πŸ’»πŸ§ βˆ‡πŸ”¬πŸ“ˆ,πŸ‹οΈβ€β™‚οΈβ›·οΈπŸ‚πŸ›ΉπŸ•Ίβ›°οΈβ˜•πŸ¦– 19 h
Odgovor korisniku/ci @nicholdav
There are lots of cases where you are good as long as you don't see the labels . But given the bad things people do I will totally say live is a lie.
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviΔ‘a mi se"
KordingLab πŸ‘¨β€πŸ’»πŸ§ βˆ‡πŸ”¬πŸ“ˆ,πŸ‹οΈβ€β™‚οΈβ›·οΈπŸ‚πŸ›ΉπŸ•Ίβ›°οΈβ˜•πŸ¦– proslijedio/la je tweet
Eric Jonas 23 h
β€œJudgments of effort for magical violations of intuitive physics” or β€œhow much harder is it to conjure a frog?” This is my new favorite Tomer paper
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviΔ‘a mi se"
KordingLab πŸ‘¨β€πŸ’»πŸ§ βˆ‡πŸ”¬πŸ“ˆ,πŸ‹οΈβ€β™‚οΈβ›·οΈπŸ‚πŸ›ΉπŸ•Ίβ›°οΈβ˜•πŸ¦– 22 h
By far the best introduction to probabilistic computation i have seen so far: I also love the juxtaposition of code and graphs. By /ht
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviΔ‘a mi se"
KordingLab πŸ‘¨β€πŸ’»πŸ§ βˆ‡πŸ”¬πŸ“ˆ,πŸ‹οΈβ€β™‚οΈβ›·οΈπŸ‚πŸ›ΉπŸ•Ίβ›°οΈβ˜•πŸ¦– 24 h
Odgovor korisniku/ci @DanzigerZachary
interestingly, you can take these super overparameterized models and compress them enough that you get pretty small models. For which you can then sometimes give meaningful generalization bounds, PAC Bayes style.
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviΔ‘a mi se"
KordingLab πŸ‘¨β€πŸ’»πŸ§ βˆ‡πŸ”¬πŸ“ˆ,πŸ‹οΈβ€β™‚οΈβ›·οΈπŸ‚πŸ›ΉπŸ•Ίβ›°οΈβ˜•πŸ¦– 4. velj
but the experimentalists are becoming a lot more mathematically sophisticiated. Which bodes well for the future of the field.
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviΔ‘a mi se"
KordingLab πŸ‘¨β€πŸ’»πŸ§ βˆ‡πŸ”¬πŸ“ˆ,πŸ‹οΈβ€β™‚οΈβ›·οΈπŸ‚πŸ›ΉπŸ•Ίβ›°οΈβ˜•πŸ¦– 4. velj
But also, and maybe sociologically more important, computation is essential for literally any measurement now. The people who can do that can also relate to modeling in a deeper way.
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviΔ‘a mi se"
KordingLab πŸ‘¨β€πŸ’»πŸ§ βˆ‡πŸ”¬πŸ“ˆ,πŸ‹οΈβ€β™‚οΈβ›·οΈπŸ‚πŸ›ΉπŸ•Ίβ›°οΈβ˜•πŸ¦– 4. velj
I think that both modeling and experimentation had in the past made bad epistemological choices and is in the process of fixing that. Which may have us finally see modeling move closer to the center of neuroscience.
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviΔ‘a mi se"
KordingLab πŸ‘¨β€πŸ’»πŸ§ βˆ‡πŸ”¬πŸ“ˆ,πŸ‹οΈβ€β™‚οΈβ›·οΈπŸ‚πŸ›ΉπŸ•Ίβ›°οΈβ˜•πŸ¦– 4. velj
I do not understand the original question. Forward models should contain how the world really works. This seems to be where the CI problem occurs. Inverse models are then just how to make the world better, given the forward model.
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviΔ‘a mi se"
KordingLab πŸ‘¨β€πŸ’»πŸ§ βˆ‡πŸ”¬πŸ“ˆ,πŸ‹οΈβ€β™‚οΈβ›·οΈπŸ‚πŸ›ΉπŸ•Ίβ›°οΈβ˜•πŸ¦– 3. velj
Odgovor korisniku/ci @tdverstynen @neuro_data
Once you add pretty much any additional idea things get really hard.
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviΔ‘a mi se"
KordingLab πŸ‘¨β€πŸ’»πŸ§ βˆ‡πŸ”¬πŸ“ˆ,πŸ‹οΈβ€β™‚οΈβ›·οΈπŸ‚πŸ›ΉπŸ•Ίβ›°οΈβ˜•πŸ¦– 3. velj
Odgovor korisniku/ci @tdverstynen @neuro_data
Not so sure. I still don't grok linear regression
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviΔ‘a mi se"
KordingLab πŸ‘¨β€πŸ’»πŸ§ βˆ‡πŸ”¬πŸ“ˆ,πŸ‹οΈβ€β™‚οΈβ›·οΈπŸ‚πŸ›ΉπŸ•Ίβ›°οΈβ˜•πŸ¦– 3. velj
Odgovor korisniku/ci @KordingLab
how well NTK describe actual ANN learning is still a matter of great debate.
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviΔ‘a mi se"
KordingLab πŸ‘¨β€πŸ’»πŸ§ βˆ‡πŸ”¬πŸ“ˆ,πŸ‹οΈβ€β™‚οΈβ›·οΈπŸ‚πŸ›ΉπŸ•Ίβ›°οΈβ˜•πŸ¦– 3. velj
Neural Tangent Kernels (NTK) are a way of understanding neural networks in a certain domain (in the limit of N ->\infty, W0 not ~0). It is beautiful. And somewhat counterintuitive. Here are two nice write-ups aimed at explaining: ,
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviΔ‘a mi se"
KordingLab πŸ‘¨β€πŸ’»πŸ§ βˆ‡πŸ”¬πŸ“ˆ,πŸ‹οΈβ€β™‚οΈβ›·οΈπŸ‚πŸ›ΉπŸ•Ίβ›°οΈβ˜•πŸ¦– 3. velj
Odgovor korisniku/ci @jpillowtime @neuroecology
We should write the NTK for Neuro folks paper ;)
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviΔ‘a mi se"