We're yet to hear what caused Yovanovitch’s alleged early departure, but imo her stint in Ukraine can largely be defined by her relationship with anti-corruption agencies and activists there.
-
-
Show this thread
-
The support Ukraine's NABU received from
@FBI &@USEmbassyKyiv under Yovanovitch defined that agency's credibility with Ukrainians. That's why I think NABU's alleged corruption hurt the US standing in UAhttps://twitter.com/kooleksiy/status/1105212663217434625 …Show this thread -
Western support for NABU was criticized in Ukraine at the highest level by less than perfect criticshttps://twitter.com/kooleksiy/status/1105212663217434625 …
Show this thread -
In what is VERY illustrative of Ukraine's (&Yovanovitch) fight against corruption, Yovanovitch in a recent speech called for removal of Anti-Corruption Prosecutor Kholodnytsky. THE IRONY: 2 years ago the USA Embassy praised him for "progress in prosecuting high-level corruption"pic.twitter.com/QYs2VuN7nm
Show this thread -
Embattled Prosecutor General likely implied Yovanovitch when in March he said “attacks by foreign embassies” & “so-called activists” defending “monopoly”of the National Anti-Corruption Bureau rendered other agencies unable to prosecute corruption https://youtu.be/KrydaiCpTU8
Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
officials for supporting allegedly disruptive anti-corruption activists. Her support for a particular anti-corruption agency, NABU, backfired when it was implicated in corruption by reporters