Twitter | Pretraživanje | |
Kevin Hardegree-Ullman
Exoplanets, cool stars, brown dwarfs. He/him/his.
903
Tweetovi
268
Pratim
270
Osobe koje vas prate
Tweetovi
Kevin Hardegree-Ullman 4 h
Odgovor korisniku/ci @andreamatranga
The orbital periods range between 4 hours and 80 (Earth) days. Planets appear to form at all distances to their host star, and there is no correlation between the gap and orbital period.
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
Kevin Hardegree-Ullman 19 h
Odgovor korisniku/ci @andreamatranga
Astronomers believe planet formation is complete and solar systems don't change much by ~100 million years after the star forms. Most of these planets are around stars that are billions of years old. There are currently very few planets known around very young stars.
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
Kevin Hardegree-Ullman 20 h
And were interviewed by Scientific American:
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
Kevin Hardegree-Ullman 20 h
The science advisors wrote a research note:
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
Kevin Hardegree-Ullman 24 h
Odgovor korisniku/ci @a_santerne @arXiver
This is plot 16 of the paper. There are definitely other plots that are more representative of the overall scientific results of the paper, but I understand automated systems have some pitfalls.
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
Kevin Hardegree-Ullman 4. velj
Odgovor korisniku/ci @aussiastronomer
Orphan 55 😂
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
Kevin Hardegree-Ullman 4. velj
Odgovor korisniku/ci @kevinkhu
Odds are higher if "Planck used a Gaussian process in their Bayesian technique to model the Rayleigh scattering slope of the atmosphere." 🤯
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
Kevin Hardegree-Ullman 4. velj
If someone said out loud "the homogeneous analysis provided updated ephemerides and eccentricities for the exoplanet systems," there's a 150% probability of my head exploding. 🙄
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
Kevin Hardegree-Ullman 4. velj
I'm not sure how selects the plot to tweet, but this one highlights that you should definitely be careful with Gaia temperatures!
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
Kevin Hardegree-Ullman proslijedio/la je tweet
Ethan Kruse 3. velj
Any undergrads want a paid summer internship at ? Our group is looking for 5 awesome people to help us find and study planets with TESS. I can nearly guarantee you'll discover a new exoplanet if you want to work on the search side! It's a thrill that never fades!
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
Kevin Hardegree-Ullman proslijedio/la je tweet
Jon Zink 3. velj
I have a new paper out today! "Scaling K2. II. Assembly of a Fully Automated C5 Planet Candidate Catalog Using EDI-Vetter" The first fully automated analysis of transiting K2 exoplanets.
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
Kevin Hardegree-Ullman 3. velj
Odgovor korisniku/ci @amannastro
Absolutely. I think K dwarfs are probably the best kept open secret in exoplanets. Probably a poor choice to down-weight for TESS.
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
Kevin Hardegree-Ullman 3. velj
Odgovor korisniku/ci @amannastro
It appears to be an artifact of the random forest. Few LAMOST targets were <3500K and fainter than M_K=6, so it probably latched onto mostly warmer and sometimes brighter targets. There's definitely room for improvement on the photometric M dwarf Teffs.
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
Kevin Hardegree-Ullman 3. velj
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
Kevin Hardegree-Ullman 3. velj
Odgovor korisniku/ci @kevinkhu
K2 Planet Occurrence Rates, here we come...
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
Kevin Hardegree-Ullman 3. velj
Odgovor korisniku/ci @jonKzink
BUT WAIT.... THERE'S MORE! Go read "Scaling K2. II. Assembly of a Fully Automated C5 Planet Candidate Catalog Using EDI-Vetter", led by !
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
Kevin Hardegree-Ullman 3. velj
Odgovor korisniku/ci @jonKzink @aussiastronomer i 2 ostali
Many thanks to , , , David R. Ciardi, and for their important contributions to this paper!
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
Kevin Hardegree-Ullman 3. velj
Odgovor korisniku/ci @kevinkhu
This result would not have been easily identifiable without a uniform set of stellar parameters.
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
Kevin Hardegree-Ullman 3. velj
Odgovor korisniku/ci @kevinkhu
This means that the Kepler result is not a fluke, and since K2 probes different regions in the Galaxy, this result is not exclusive to the Kepler field! Here's how the radius valley looks in relation to incident stellar flux (left), and compared Kepler (right).
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
Kevin Hardegree-Ullman 3. velj
Odgovor korisniku/ci @kevinkhu
Using our new stellar parameters, we re-derived radii for 299 confirmed and 517 candidate planets and something magical happened: WE FOUND A DEFINITIVE PLANET RADIUS GAP FOR THE FIRST TIME IN A DATA SET OTHER THAN KEPLER!
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"