Twitter | Search | |
Penny Kilkenny May 24
The accusations keep piling up for proGMO Supporter & self proclaimed “Mother Theresa” of transparency and virtue How will he spin this one or will he just ignore it? any thoughts girls?
Reply Retweet Like
Jenny Splitter May 24
Sure, first, I’m 43, not a girl. 2nd, what’s described is violent, gross, abusive behavior that I obviously don’t support. I suggest people look to the other many wonderful scientists and science communicators out there for information, as there are plenty.
Reply Retweet Like
Kevin Folta
And maybe don't take advice for GM Watch and fake troll accounts. I have a hostile ex that wants to harm my career and reputation. She's in bed with GM Watch, Thacker and others. It is an orchestrated hit job. If you buy it, then fine. You side with them?
Reply Retweet Like More
Jenny Splitter May 24
I’m not taking advice. I am commenting on the behavior as described. Are you saying this witness was misquoted?
Reply Retweet Like
Lawrence McLachlan May 24
Could be bullshit. Happens occasionally on social media
Reply Retweet Like
Kevin Folta May 24
Damn right. My hostile ex has funneled massive information to GM Watch. Sad that alleged science advocates side with Thacker, GM Watch. It will not serve them well.
Reply Retweet Like
Thomas Baldwin May 24
What? How could the zero evidence provided be wrong?
Reply Retweet Like
Jenny Splitter May 24
The person quoted in the story isn’t your ex. Are you saying she’s not credible? Or are you saying GM Watch fabricated the entire thing?
Reply Retweet Like
Lawrence McLachlan May 24
I said it could be bullshit. Thacker has me blocked. So I am just commenting as is my right😊
Reply Retweet Like
Jenny Splitter May 24
I’m asking that to Kevin actually.
Reply Retweet Like
Kevin Folta May 24
Let me ask you. do you find GM Watch a credible source of information? Let's start there. They are being fed bad nformation from a hostile ex. Look at the 3 other recent posts about me. Your last comments say that GM Watch is a better source than me for science. stand by that?
Reply Retweet Like
Kevin Folta May 24
It is not 100% wrong, but it is a malicious interpretation of actual events, which is what a hateful ex, her allies, and GM Watch want. Sadly, nobody asks questions, they listen to GM Watch and Thacker.
Reply Retweet Like
Ada Marie McVean ♠️ May 24
I’m confused how kicking someone’s partner could be ‘true but not true’? How, if you’re saying there’s truth to this claim, is it being misinterpreted?
Reply Retweet Like
Lawrence McLachlan May 24
Mine was worse. House was bare. Even took the fn toilet seat😂
Reply Retweet Like
Kevin Folta May 24
As usual, there are two sides to every story. Do you want to go on record as siding with GM Watch? LMK.
Reply Retweet Like
Dale Ketcheson May 24
Well, you left it up.... that made it fair game 😉
Reply Retweet Like
Ada Marie McVean ♠️ May 24
I don’t know Thacker. I barely have followed you, but I don’t see how someone’s scientific credibility comes into play. If a witness says you kicked your wife, and you’re saying there’s at least some truth to that, isn’t that the end of discussion?
Reply Retweet Like
Lawrence McLachlan May 24
It was padded.
Reply Retweet Like
Jenny Splitter May 24
That’s preposterous and you know it. I’ve zero interest in your messy divorce. I just won’t stay silent when asked directly about abuse. It’s not my job to protect you.
Reply Retweet Like
Kevin Folta May 24
It is a gross miscaracterization. Period. She only levied such issues after our divorce. The checks were gladly accepted until they became a weapon years later.
Reply Retweet Like