Twitter | Pretraživanje | |
Keenan Crane
Digital Geometer. Assistant Professor of Computer Science and Robotics , and member of the .
748
Tweetovi
135
Pratim
3.092
Osobe koje vas prate
Tweetovi
Keenan Crane proslijedio/la je tweet
Nick Sharp 29. sij
Just pushed a update with lots of small features and bugfixes😀 Change the "up" direction, preserve settings when re-registering quantities, save and restore the camera with ctrl-c/ctrl-v, and more! Check it out:
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
Keenan Crane 26. sij
Odgovor korisniku/ci @ddiakopoulos @nmwsharp
Sweet! Would be interesting to compare/contrast with hapPLY:
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
Keenan Crane 25. sij
Odgovor korisniku/ci @JustinMSolomon @amirvaxman_dgp
Seems only for the committee:
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
Keenan Crane 25. sij
Odgovor korisniku/ci @JustinMSolomon @amirvaxman_dgp
Where?
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
Keenan Crane 25. sij
Odgovor korisniku/ci @amirvaxman_dgp @topher_batty
That’s precisely what the TOG form is/was: you’re raising the issue to the EiC, and they make a decision.
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
Keenan Crane 25. sij
Odgovor korisniku/ci @amirvaxman_dgp @topher_batty
There are cases where someone has a clear personal vendetta. When TOG was single-blind, it took a “please do not ask this person to review list,” which was respected. Can’t recall if this has changed now that it’s (more) double-blind.
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
Keenan Crane 25. sij
Odgovor korisniku/ci @amirvaxman_dgp @topher_batty
Like , I'm confused about what you're saying. Are you looking at some data that indicates people are flagging false conflicts? And what "list of authors" are you referring to?
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
Keenan Crane 13. sij
Odgovor korisniku/ci @angelo93728560 @ALoopingIcon
Hi , we’d love to get some example code out. In the meantime you can compare against our results (and many more) at
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
Keenan Crane 11. sij
Nice bachelor's thesis by Christian Clemenz that writes up some aspects of "Globally Optimal Direction Fields" in detail, including treatment of boundary conditions and sharp edges: Original project here:
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
Keenan Crane 11. sij
Yes, exactly.
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
Keenan Crane 10. sij
Most useful thing I have learned about Mathematica in the past year: you *can* actually tell it that some variables are (always!) real, positive, etc., using the global $Assumptions list.
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
Keenan Crane 6. sij
Great stuff from and for rapidly prototyping geometric algorithms
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
Keenan Crane 5. sij
Odgovor korisniku/ci @keenanisalive
(The other point of a caption, of course, is to totally oversell your research—which is really just bananas. 🍌)
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
Keenan Crane 5. sij
I find that many students struggle early on to write good figure captions. A good caption doesn't just explain what’s already apparent in an image—it highlights how a specific example supports a more general principle, and explains why that principle is relevant or interesting.
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
Keenan Crane 30. pro
Odgovor korisniku/ci @amirvaxman_dgp @AntoineVacavant
Who said anything about angles? I'm just curious about ways you can dice up a tetrahedron! :-)
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
Keenan Crane 30. pro
Odgovor korisniku/ci @amirvaxman_dgp @AntoineVacavant
Right. Here's a picture of the subdivision is talking about, which can be used to trivially convert any tetrahedral mesh into a hexahedral mesh—but with poor angles near tet vertices. Any other way to split up a tet into cubes? :-)
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
Keenan Crane 29. pro
How do you chop up a tetrahedron into nicely-shaped little cubes? Here's one way, obtained a la symmetric moving frames (). How else can you do it?
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
Keenan Crane proslijedio/la je tweet
David Coeurjolly 22. pro
Integration example project between (geometry processing of digital/voxel data) and the excellent ‘s polyscope viewer ():
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
Keenan Crane 11. pro
Odgovor korisniku/ci @clegoues
SIGGRAPH is around 14-16 for committee members, but each one of those is shared with (i) another committee member and (ii) three external reviewers. Not sure it’s the ideal workload, but review quality is, on the whole, consistently excellent.
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
Keenan Crane proslijedio/la je tweet
Keenan Crane 29. stu
Want to change the way the world thinks about geometric computing? The Geometry Collective at Carnegie Mellon University is looking for PhD students for 2020/2021. Topics include mesh processing, discrete differential geometry, and computational design.
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"