|
Keenan Crane
@
keenanisalive
Pittsburgh, PA
|
|
Digital Geometer. Assistant Professor of Computer Science and Robotics @CarnegieMellon @SCSatCMU, and member of the @GeomCollective.
|
|
|
748
Tweetovi
|
135
Pratim
|
3.092
Osobe koje vas prate
|
| Tweetovi |
| Keenan Crane proslijedio/la je tweet | ||
|
Nick Sharp
@nmwsharp
|
29. sij |
|
Just pushed a #polyscope update with lots of small features and bugfixes😀
Change the "up" direction, preserve settings when re-registering quantities, save and restore the camera with ctrl-c/ctrl-v, and more!
Check it out: polyscope.run pic.twitter.com/wcP3dIuyuf
|
||
|
|
||
|
Keenan Crane
@keenanisalive
|
26. sij |
|
Sweet! Would be interesting to compare/contrast with hapPLY: github.com/nmwsharp/happly @nmwsharp
|
||
|
|
||
|
Keenan Crane
@keenanisalive
|
25. sij |
|
Seems only for the committee: pic.twitter.com/SMhTPO3lWG
|
||
|
|
||
|
Keenan Crane
@keenanisalive
|
25. sij |
|
Where?
|
||
|
|
||
|
Keenan Crane
@keenanisalive
|
25. sij |
|
That’s precisely what the TOG form is/was: you’re raising the issue to the EiC, and they make a decision.
|
||
|
|
||
|
Keenan Crane
@keenanisalive
|
25. sij |
|
There are cases where someone has a clear personal vendetta. When TOG was single-blind, it took a “please do not ask this person to review list,” which was respected. Can’t recall if this has changed now that it’s (more) double-blind.
|
||
|
|
||
|
Keenan Crane
@keenanisalive
|
25. sij |
|
Like @topher_batty, I'm confused about what you're saying. Are you looking at some data that indicates people are flagging false conflicts? And what "list of authors" are you referring to?
|
||
|
|
||
|
Keenan Crane
@keenanisalive
|
13. sij |
|
Hi @angelo93728560, we’d love to get some example code out. In the meantime you can compare against our results (and many more) at hexalab.net @ALoopingIcon
|
||
|
|
||
|
Keenan Crane
@keenanisalive
|
11. sij |
|
Nice bachelor's thesis by Christian Clemenz that writes up some aspects of "Globally Optimal Direction Fields" in detail, including treatment of boundary conditions and sharp edges: pdfs.semanticscholar.org/5870/0fd0ce4e2… Original project here: cs.cmu.edu/~kmcrane/Proje… pic.twitter.com/Lj3geaiJmz
|
||
|
|
||
|
Keenan Crane
@keenanisalive
|
11. sij |
|
Yes, exactly.
|
||
|
|
||
|
Keenan Crane
@keenanisalive
|
10. sij |
|
Most useful thing I have learned about Mathematica in the past year: you *can* actually tell it that some variables are (always!) real, positive, etc., using the global $Assumptions list. @WolframResearch @Wolfram_Alpha #Mathematica pic.twitter.com/VYzEBoDZIa
|
||
|
|
||
|
Keenan Crane
@keenanisalive
|
6. sij |
|
Great stuff from @dcoeurjo and @nmwsharp for rapidly prototyping geometric algorithms twitter.com/libdgtal/statu…
|
||
|
|
||
|
Keenan Crane
@keenanisalive
|
5. sij |
|
(The other point of a caption, of course, is to totally oversell your research—which is really just bananas. 🍌)
|
||
|
|
||
|
Keenan Crane
@keenanisalive
|
5. sij |
|
I find that many students struggle early on to write good figure captions. A good caption doesn't just explain what’s already apparent in an image—it highlights how a specific example supports a more general principle, and explains why that principle is relevant or interesting. pic.twitter.com/8OYGQv5bXX
|
||
|
|
||
|
Keenan Crane
@keenanisalive
|
30. pro |
|
Who said anything about angles? I'm just curious about ways you can dice up a tetrahedron! :-)
|
||
|
|
||
|
Keenan Crane
@keenanisalive
|
30. pro |
|
Right. Here's a picture of the subdivision @amirvaxman_dgp is talking about, which can be used to trivially convert any tetrahedral mesh into a hexahedral mesh—but with poor angles near tet vertices. Any other way to split up a tet into cubes? :-) pic.twitter.com/W2aGRA691t
|
||
|
|
||
|
Keenan Crane
@keenanisalive
|
29. pro |
|
How do you chop up a tetrahedron into nicely-shaped little cubes? Here's one way, obtained a la symmetric moving frames (cs.cmu.edu/~kmcrane/Proje…). How else can you do it? pic.twitter.com/Cx3WyjYTJm
|
||
|
|
||
| Keenan Crane proslijedio/la je tweet | ||
|
David Coeurjolly
@dcoeurjo
|
22. pro |
|
Integration example project between @libdgtal (geometry processing of digital/voxel data) and the excellent @nmwsharp ‘s polyscope viewer (polyscope.run): github.com/dcoeurjo/polys…
|
||
|
|
||
|
Keenan Crane
@keenanisalive
|
11. pro |
|
SIGGRAPH is around 14-16 for committee members, but each one of those is shared with (i) another committee member and (ii) three external reviewers. Not sure it’s the ideal workload, but review quality is, on the whole, consistently excellent.
|
||
|
|
||
| Keenan Crane proslijedio/la je tweet | ||
|
Keenan Crane
@keenanisalive
|
29. stu |
|
Want to change the way the world thinks about geometric computing? The Geometry Collective at Carnegie Mellon University is looking for PhD students for 2020/2021. Topics include mesh processing, discrete differential geometry, and computational design. applygrad.cs.cmu.edu/apply/index.ph… pic.twitter.com/ppOIVRmIXF
|
||
|
|
||