Twitter | Pretraživanje | |
Kate Irby
CA Congressional reporter for , including . Unofficial title is Master of Mayhem, according to a bat on my desk.
13.693
Tweetovi
800
Pratim
12.245
Osobe koje vas prate
Tweetovi
Kate Irby proslijedio/la je tweet
Francesca Chambers 7 h
Devin Nunes wasn't on the president's official "impeachment team" when the US Senate took up the articles last month. But as and I write today, President Trump hailed him in his post-impeachment remarks. Nunes also received a standing ovation.
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
Kate Irby 8 h
Odgovor korisniku/ci @DevinCow @JesselynRadack
Twitter responded that it only meant that ", like hundreds of thousands of other Twitter users, found some of ’s commentary about Congressman Nunes to be entertaining."
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
Kate Irby 8 h
Odgovor korisniku/ci @DevinCow @JesselynRadack
Biss said was related to this case, according to Twitter's lawyers, because of two tweets that sent to .
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
Kate Irby 8 h
Odgovor korisniku/ci @DevinCow
Twitter said Nunes' attorney, Steven Biss, was trying to circumvent the discovery process in Nunes' own lawsuit against Twitter by requesting identifying info on in an unrelated case:
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
Kate Irby 8 h
Twitter demands legal fees from Devin Nunes’ attorney in new filing over fake cow’s identity:
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
Kate Irby 15 h
Setbacks and high stakes: Mitch McConnell delivers Trump, and himself, a victory (via )
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
Kate Irby proslijedio/la je tweet
Adam Ashton 5. velj
The first notices about the 2020 will hit mailboxes next month. In the meantime, this "Census" is actually a fundraising pitch for Trump.
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
Kate Irby proslijedio/la je tweet
Dale Kasler 5. velj
NEW - was ready to sue over water. Then he paused. Here's why. w/
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
Kate Irby 5. velj
Odgovor korisniku/ci @jkbjournalist
You have been there much longer than two years, so I totally believe you.
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
Kate Irby proslijedio/la je tweet
Emma Dumain 5. velj
Late to tweet this but my colleagues on the politics desk have been doing great work:
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
Kate Irby 5. velj
ICYMI: Fact check: Is Trump claim right about California’s health care for undocumented immigrants? (via )
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
Kate Irby 5. velj
As Virgin Islands, lawyers, victims fight over Epstein’s millions, judge calls for truce
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
Kate Irby proslijedio/la je tweet
Emma Dumain 5. velj
Even said “we’ll be much better off when we finally get this behind us.” “I think the whole country’s tired,” he added.
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
Kate Irby 5. velj
A fact check of some of Trump’s claims about California and its sanctuary law:
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
Kate Irby 5. velj
Twitter looking to quash subpoena for identifying info that Nunes’ lawyer, Steven Biss, tried to get in another one of his cases.
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
Kate Irby proslijedio/la je tweet
OpenSecrets.org 4. velj
- in one of the NRCC top targeted districts for 2020, incumbent Democrat ended 2019 with $2.6 million in cash on hand, more than 4X the CoH of his closest opponent.
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
Kate Irby 4. velj
Odgovor korisniku/ci @NRCC @RepJoshHarder @StopBigMoney
Anyway, it's a new question for some Democrats to navigate, since the no corporate PAC pledge is pretty new itself. You can read more here on how Harder navigated it when I asked his campaign staff questions about it:
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
Kate Irby 4. velj
Odgovor korisniku/ci @NRCC @RepJoshHarder @StopBigMoney
Democrats like Harder and , which created the pledge, say it doesn't count. The pledge was meant to remove corporate influence over politicians, and those officials argue getting the money indirectly doesn't change that.
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
Kate Irby 4. velj
Odgovor korisniku/ci @NRCC @RepJoshHarder
As the story above explains in the case of , they may take money from leadership PACs, which do take money from corporate PACs. But does that really violate the no corporate PAC pledge?
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
Kate Irby 4. velj
Quick thread: The and others have started going after Dems who take the no corporate PAC money pledge. They're saying that while Dems may not directly take money from corporate PACs, they do take it indirectly.
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"