Tweetovi

	Justin Schuh 🤬 @justinschuh	8 h
	Odgovor korisniku/ci @jyasskin In the years we've known each other have I ever given you an easy answer to a question?
	Prikaz razgovora ·

	Justin Schuh 🤬 @justinschuh	8 h
	Odgovor korisniku/ci @jyasskin I forgot to mention that this is just the first round. They'll select delegates for the next round, and IIRC the same basic winnowing process repeats at the county, district, and finally state level. So it's impossible to say now what the actual pledged delegate count will be.
	Prikaz razgovora ·

	Justin Schuh 🤬 @justinschuh	8 h
	Odgovor korisniku/ci @jyasskin Yup.
	Prikaz razgovora ·

	Justin Schuh 🤬 @justinschuh	8 h
	Odgovor korisniku/ci @jyasskin The reason I find it so funny is because in 2016 the Sanders caucusers successfully applied very similar maneuvering against Clinton. My take when Clinton people complained at the time was that this is just how caucuses work, and that is still my take.
	Prikaz razgovora ·

	Justin Schuh 🤬 @justinschuh	8 h
	Odgovor korisniku/ci @jyasskin This is the weirdness of caucus rules. The first round delegates are divided across every candidate that crosses the viability threshold. So in this case Biden probably lost a delegate or two, but in the process eliminated Sanders' lead by distributing it among other candidates.
	Prikaz razgovora ·

	Justin Schuh 🤬 @justinschuh	9 h
	😆😅😂🤣 twitter.com/philipaklein/s…
	Prikaži podatke ·

	Justin Schuh 🤬 @justinschuh	2. velj
	Odgovor korisniku/ci @ryanaraine @lcamtuf There's some very weird implementation details about how the omnibox and in-page search box on the NTP are glued together. In the code the classes that handle this are prefixed with "Fakebox".
	Prikaz razgovora ·

	Justin Schuh 🤬 proslijedio/la je tweet
	Bill Kristol @BillKristol	2. velj
	An epitaph for the Republican Party in the time of Trump. “The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command.” — George Orwell
	Prikaži podatke ·

	Justin Schuh 🤬 @justinschuh	2. velj
	Odgovor korisniku/ci @lcamtuf @laparisa See, this is just how we get along, but it is definitely us getting along. 😉
	Prikaz razgovora ·

	Justin Schuh 🤬 @justinschuh	2. velj
	This was the biggest flaw in The New Deal and The Great Society programs: the defacto restrictions that basically ensured they were available only to poor whites. twitter.com/Shacklebolt225…
	Prikaži podatke ·

	Justin Schuh 🤬 @justinschuh	2. velj
	Odgovor korisniku/ci @lcamtuf Okay, but implementation details aside, almost no one perceives a difference between their search homepage and the NTP. They're effectively the same thing. So, it seems like your argument here is against promos on the search homepage—which is an entirely reasonable argument.
	Prikaz razgovora ·

	Justin Schuh 🤬 @justinschuh	2. velj
	Odgovor korisniku/ci @lcamtuf More broadly I just don't get the argument here. You're using Google Search, and the NTP is effectively the Search homepage. I can see objecting to promos on the Search homepage, but I don't understand why anyone would expect its presentation on the NTP to be any different.
	Prikaz razgovora ·

	Justin Schuh 🤬 @justinschuh	2. velj
	Odgovor korisniku/ci @lcamtuf I replied elsewhere, but there is a purely local NTP. Last I was involved in these things it was a weird combination of legacy, testing, and a fallback. However, afaik it's not the NTP you should be seeing normally when using Google search.
	Prikaz razgovora ·

	Justin Schuh 🤬 @justinschuh	2. velj
	Odgovor korisniku/ci @lcamtuf Now I'm confused at what mode you're in. The Doodle should definitely show up on the NTP. That was a key argument for the design that handed more control of presentation to the default search engine. And I know Bing has used these capabilities as well.
	Prikaz razgovora ·

	Justin Schuh 🤬 @justinschuh	2. velj
	Odgovor korisniku/ci @lcamtuf Might be for the old, local NTP. Might be an injection point for debugging and testing. I don't know the technical details and haven't been responsible for anyone working on this for a while. My point stands though, that the search engine owns those parts of the NTP.
	Prikaz razgovora ·

	Justin Schuh 🤬 @justinschuh	2. velj
	Odgovor korisniku/ci @lcamtuf It doesn't seem much different from a Google focused Doodle to me, in that it's intended as a sentimental promo for the site you're currently visiting. But I also rarely use the NTP. I type into the omnibox and hit alt-enter for a new tab.
	Prikaz razgovora ·

	Justin Schuh 🤬 @justinschuh	2. velj
	Odgovor korisniku/ci @lcamtuf It hasn't worked like that since about 2013. There are still ways to trigger a purely local default NTP (e.g. the search provider is unavailable). However, your default search provider is basically the NTP if you haven't changed it, so we don't run that show.
	Prikaz razgovora ·

	Justin Schuh 🤬 @justinschuh	2. velj
	Odgovor korisniku/ci @lcamtuf You can change your NTP. If no NTP is set it's inferred from the default search engine (iirc it's in the opensearch record). But at the end of the day the search engine owns all of this, so I don't get framing it as some sort of Chrome thing.
	Prikaz razgovora ·

	Justin Schuh 🤬 @justinschuh	2. velj
	Odgovor korisniku/ci @lcamtuf This is just what's on the Google homepage. The NTP is the Google homepage plus some integration with your local browser state (isolated, so the remote site can't access that state). But if you don't want the Google homepage as your NTP, you can always change it.
	Prikaz razgovora ·

	Justin Schuh 🤬 proslijedio/la je tweet
	Mehdi Hasan @mehdirhasan	2. velj
	The lunacy of conservative America in a nutshell: twitter.com/joe_gerth/stat…
	Prikaži podatke ·