Twitter | Pretraživanje | |
april 🦝 cyberglot 20. lis 2017.
Odgovor korisniku/ci @jusrin00
this whole “Regular Joe” bullshit infuriates me so much I can’t even
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
Mark Hopkins 20. lis 2017.
Odgovor korisniku/ci @cyberglot @jusrin00
"I'm going to protect you schmucks from ever having to extend yourselves and learn anything new. In fact, it won't even be possible."
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
Daniel Brice 4. pro 2018.
Odgovor korisniku/ci @jusrin00
Yes, our three supertypes are number, comparable, and appendable. And compappend---Four! Our four supertypes are...
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
Monoid Mary 4. pro 2018.
Odgovor korisniku/ci @fried_brice @jusrin00
oh shit I'm dying
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
Stephen Diehl 20. lis 2017.
Odgovor korisniku/ci @jusrin00
Evan is really channeling Rob Pike here... Regular Joe is "[...] not capable of understanding a brilliant language".
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
Ian Jeffries 20. lis 2017.
Odgovor korisniku/ci @jusrin00
Bad reasoning, good outcome. "Pretentious" isn't deserved -- Haskell typeclasses are awesome and named correctly.
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
Ian Jeffries 20. lis 2017.
Odgovor korisniku/ci @jusrin00
But the outcome is fine, we badly needed a quick to learn lang with referential transparency and algebraic data types.
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
Ilias 20. lis 2017.
Odgovor korisniku/ci @jusrin00
Why is there so much drama over a random unsourced interpretation of Elm's design? Few Elm users hold that opinion, for many it's a gateway
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"