Twitter | Search | |
🍌 John 🍌
Webmaster Trends Analyst at Google. For webmaster help, check out the forum at
14,346
Tweets
410
Following
51,465
Followers
Tweets
🍌 John 🍌 retweeted
Google Webmasters 10h
Are you wondering if Googlebot can see your content? 🤔 👩‍💻 Learn how to test and debug your website for issues! This week on JavaScript SEO, talks about tools to make sure your website is search-friendly. 🤖 Watch here →
Reply Retweet Like
🍌 John 🍌 9h
Replying to @SlackDigital
No, you're welcome to do that, but you need to make sure that Google Images is carved out so that we can show the images there for users. It's more a practical thing, than a requirement for what you do everywhere.
Reply Retweet Like
🍌 John 🍌 13h
Replying to @SlackDigital
If we can't show your images in Image Search because you don't allow them to be used within the search results, it doesn't really make sense to show your images there (it's not useful for you or folks looking for your site). That doesn't affect the rest of search.
Reply Retweet Like
🍌 John 🍌 15h
They were threatening much worse :). (The lighting in that room looks terrible, and the microwave's "ping" was a bit unique :-))
Reply Retweet Like
🍌 John 🍌 17h
Replying to @klaudiofejzaj
To be honest, that doesn't give me a lot of feedback (past ranking doesn't guarantee future ranking); if you have general queries where you see that the results are bad (not just "my site is just as good"), I'd love to forward the specifics to the team.
Reply Retweet Like
🍌 John 🍌 20h
Oh, I'm well aware that discouraging smart & curious SEOs to test something is a bit futile, but I thought I'd be blunt regardless :)
Reply Retweet Like
🍌 John 🍌 20h
It's easy to waste a lot of time trying to find the exact parameters for this, but canonicalization uses a lot more factors, almost every case will be different, and it's unlikely that you'd figure out anything useful here.
Reply Retweet Like
🍌 John 🍌 Mar 19
Replying to @dportney
I think that's fine - you don't need those per-post feed URLs indexed.
Reply Retweet Like
🍌 John 🍌 Mar 19
Replying to @dportney
I don't see a problem with that.
Reply Retweet Like
🍌 John 🍌 retweeted
Pascal Birchler Mar 19
I‘m looking for some WordPress plugins that heavily use the Gutenberg React components outside the editor. Thankful for every suggestion!
Reply Retweet Like
🍌 John 🍌 Mar 19
Also, no.
Reply Retweet Like
🍌 John 🍌 Mar 19
Googlebot doesn't take cookies.
Reply Retweet Like
🍌 John 🍌 Mar 19
Ah, gotcha. Yeah, I've been wanting to write that up. The short is feel free to personalize, but keep in mind that Googlebot will just see one version, so usually it makes sense to keep a part of the page stable.
Reply Retweet Like
🍌 John 🍌 Mar 19
I'm not a fan of Christmas, so I think that means I shouldn't do it. That said, I couldn't follow the thread here to know what specifically y'all mean :-). What should we do, what would make your lives easier in this regard?
Reply Retweet Like
🍌 John 🍌 retweeted
Jake Archibald Mar 19
📝 Who has the fastest website in F1? A deep-dive on: 🏁 How to test for performance. 🏁 How to interpret WebPageTest results. 🏁 How to optimise images. 🏁 Analysing code coverage. 🏁 How to avoid common performance pitfalls.
Reply Retweet Like
🍌 John 🍌 retweeted
Lea Kissner Mar 17
You have got to be kidding. My spouse has a Razer mouse which just asked to install mining software. MINING. SOFTWARE. They "pay" you in loyalty scrip. They claim it has no access to your data, which sounds like quite a trick.
Reply Retweet Like
🍌 John 🍌 Mar 19
Replying to @g33konaut
No need to rush the time to first bite :). Have a great break!
Reply Retweet Like
🍌 John 🍌 Mar 18
Everything = nothing.
Reply Retweet Like
🍌 John 🍌 Mar 18
Replying to @512banque @ohgm
I see it on the tweetdeck subdomain, so I assume DA=0.
Reply Retweet Like
🍌 John 🍌 Mar 18
Replying to @joehall @dannysullivan
It should be up to date - the dev-site is pretty much the canonical place for the documentation of the structured data we use for search. If you spot irregularities, happy to pass that on!
Reply Retweet Like