Twitter | Pretraživanje | |
John Carlos Baez
I do math, physics, network theory at U. C. Riverside and the Centre for Quantum Technologies in Singapore.
16.377
Tweetovi
187
Pratim
26.426
Osobe koje vas prate
Tweetovi
John Carlos Baez 6 h
Odgovor korisniku/ci @wires_wires @NYTScience @statebox
That'd be great. How old will you be then? 🙃
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
John Carlos Baez 6 h
Odgovor korisniku/ci @james_nichols @_julesh_ i 2 ostali
I'd never heard of "UMAP". This paper defines fuzzy simplicial sets as simplicial objects in the category of fuzzy sets. That's a completely obvious maneuver if one knows category theory, and a lot of theorems instantly hold. Category theory gives you power.
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
John Carlos Baez 10 h
Odgovor korisniku/ci @Lydia_M_W
The sensitivity on initial conditions, and the impossibility of taking all relevant effects into account, means that all we can do is study probable scenarios... and maybe estimate their probabilities.
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
John Carlos Baez 10 h
Odgovor korisniku/ci @Lydia_M_W @jeffreyketland
No, I've given up on fundamental physics. I think I had some good ideas, but not enough to add up to a theory. Other subjects are so much easier to make progress in! I'm more productive now.
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
John Carlos Baez 12 h
Odgovor korisniku/ci @Phaseit @JadeMasterMath i 2 ostali
I guess it's mainly a question of how much it interests you! Some historian of mathematics should have written about the evolution of the concept of function. Someday somebody will, that's for sure. If nobody has yet, maybe that person will be you. 🙃
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
John Carlos Baez 14 h
Odgovor korisniku/ci @jfpas @StevenWenner1 @VergaraLautaro
Whoops. I always set c = 1 so I tend to screw up when sticking the c's back in.
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
John Carlos Baez 14 h
Odgovor korisniku/ci @RobJLow @CourDFleming i 2 ostali
I think Minkowski is great! I learned how great only when I started studying what he *really* worked on: number theory. He invented "the geometry of numbers": which is all about lattices, and secretly quadratic forms.
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
John Carlos Baez 14 h
Odgovor korisniku/ci @RobJLow @CourDFleming i 2 ostali
I agree. That's why I said Einstein's discovery "boils down to" this. Einstein's old math professor Minkowski did some of the crucial boiling here! (Though I believe Minkowski still used "i t", imaginary time, which is a bit distracting - especially when we get to GR.)
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
John Carlos Baez 15 h
There are different ways to try to mesh this with other mathematical structures, but quaternions turn out not to be very good for this. It's better to just learn about "Minkowski spacetime":
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
John Carlos Baez 15 h
Einstein's big discovery - special relativity - boils down to this. Spacetime is 4-dimensional, and vector have this sort of dot product: (t,x,y,z) ⋅ (t',x',y',z') = tt' - xx' - yy' - zz' Everything else follows from this, basically. (1/n)
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
John Carlos Baez 15 h
Odgovor korisniku/ci @StevenWenner1 @VergaraLautaro
In the modern understanding, mass is the Lorentz-invariant "length squared" of the energy-momentum vector (E,p). That's what the formula m^2 = E^2 - p^2 says, working now in units where c = 1. Namely: m^2 = (E,p) · (E,p) (2/n, n = 2)
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
John Carlos Baez 15 h
Odgovor korisniku/ci @StevenWenner1 @VergaraLautaro
In the old days people talked about "rest mass" m_0 and "relativistic mass" m_0/sqrt(1-v^2/c^2). A better understanding treats mass as invariant under Lorentz transformations, defined by m^2 = E^2 c^4 - p^2 c^2 (an equation which looks nicer in units with c = 1). (1/n)
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
John Carlos Baez 16 h
Odgovor korisniku/ci @valeriadepaiva
Good!
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
John Carlos Baez 16 h
Odgovor korisniku/ci @neilfinlayson
I was trying to say that all of physics, except for some very simple parts, fits into the field of nonlinear dynamics.
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
John Carlos Baez 16 h
Odgovor korisniku/ci @neilfinlayson
Okay. Almost any physical system is nonlinear. There are just a few where the dynamics is linear, like the harmonic oscillator.
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
John Carlos Baez 16 h
Odgovor korisniku/ci @Hephsiba2 @RobJLow i 3 ostali
I think Bourbaki should have called them "jections".
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
John Carlos Baez 16 h
Odgovor korisniku/ci @neilfinlayson
"Is special relativity a phenomenon of nonlinear dynamics?" I can't answer that question because I don't know what it means, especially the "a phenomenon of" part.
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
John Carlos Baez 16 h
Odgovor korisniku/ci @_julesh_ @typeswitch i 2 ostali
They're called free, but you'll pay dearly in the end.
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
John Carlos Baez 16 h
Odgovor korisniku/ci @JadeMasterMath
So you have to get inside their head... which is sometimes an unpleasant place to be. 🙃
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
John Carlos Baez 17 h
Odgovor korisniku/ci @NYTScience @statebox
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"