Twitter | Pretraživanje | |
Joshua A. Geltzer
Former White House, DOJ. Now , , , . Proud to call it as I see it. Prouder to be dad & husband. RT≠endorse.
1.370
Tweetovi
890
Pratim
18.128
Osobe koje vas prate
Tweetovi
Joshua A. Geltzer 1 h
“The source added that Trump wants Bolton to be criminally investigated.” Trump, now impeached for abusing the tools of national power, is preparing yet again to abuse the tools of national power—even before he’s acquitted? Via :
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
Joshua A. Geltzer 2 h
Folks, is a full-blown American hero for all he’s done to educate the country about Trump, impeachment, & so much more through his leadership & work elsewhere. He’s sitting at 99.8k followers. Can we get him to 100k??
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
Joshua A. Geltzer 12 h
It's a true public service by & to write UNMAKING THE PRESIDENCY They take seriously an often un-serious president & the serious changes he's wrought to the presidency--which may outlast him. Read or (better!) listen to it! Congrats Susan & Ben
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
Joshua A. Geltzer 21 h
Al-Qaeda seems responsible for the Pensacola attack. A reminder that AQ—like ISIS—may be down but isn’t out. That doesn’t mean the US should overreact. It does mean “ending the forever war” must include doing counterterrorism responsibly & sustainably.
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
Joshua A. Geltzer 2. velj
The notion that Trump’s malevolence is somehow excused by his ignorance should’ve been retired long, long ago.
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
Joshua A. Geltzer proslijedio/la je tweet
Jim Sciutto 1. velj
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
Joshua A. Geltzer 1. velj
Odgovor korisniku/ci @jgeltzer
- Why didn’t House act sooner? B/c Bolton poised to resist & litigation would’ve dragged on. But he’ll comply w/ Senate subpoena; no distinction from House - What if many redactions? Senators can read in full - Too last-minute? Better than Trump’s midnight FOIA dump yesterday!
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
Joshua A. Geltzer 1. velj
Want to hear from Bolton ASAP? - Today House Intel subpoenas him - Mon. he testifies, in a SCIF if needed - WH has 24 hrs to review transcript & redact if needed (w/ Dems threatening to read on House floor w/ speech-or-debate immunity if WH refuses) - Tue. transcript released
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
Joshua A. Geltzer 1. velj
First it was confirming a Supreme Court justice. Now it’s impeaching a president. What ELSE is on the list of things that the Senate purportedly can’t do in an election year?? I’m missing that part of the Constitution & would very much like to know.
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
Joshua A. Geltzer 31. sij
A travel ban sold by Trump as temporary, limited, & emergency in nature has again shown itself to be indefinite, unlimited, & in response to no identifiable emergency. The saddest part is that this was all obvious from the outset over 3 years ago.
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
Joshua A. Geltzer proslijedio/la je tweet
Kylie Atwood 31. sij
"We urge you to endorse voting in favor of calling witnesses and hearing evidence," writes Lev Parnas's lawyer to McConnell. Says Parnas would be able to explain in detail "thousands of micro-steps he took" in connection w/ Trump's demand for Ukraine to investigate Biden & 2016
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
Joshua A. Geltzer 31. sij
- Trump's Senate allies: "The House should've sued to enforce subpoenas!" - Trump's lawyers in court, when the House sued to enforce a subpoena: "The House isn't allowed to sue to enforce subpoenas!"
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
Joshua A. Geltzer 31. sij
It turns out that while the wheels of justice often turn slowly, the wheels of injustice sometimes turn INCREDIBLY QUICKLY. (Like before even more damaging evidence can come out...)
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
Joshua A. Geltzer proslijedio/la je tweet
Neal Katyal 31. sij
In light of this massive development, w v serious allegations against Trump (and perhaps also against his lawyer at his trial Cippillone) from his former National Security Adviser, the Senate should take a serious pause and evaluate whether they really want to rush to judgment.
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
Joshua A. Geltzer 31. sij
Recall: Rudy's claim of attorney-client privilege has been based on his PERSONAL representation of Trump. That's why Mulvaney always left the room. But now says Trump gave the order w/ Rudy, Mulvaney, Bolton & Cipollone all there. There goes attorney-client privilege!
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
Joshua A. Geltzer 31. sij
Sounds like QUITE a witness: “More than 2 months before he asked Ukraine’s president to investigate his political opponents, Trump directed Bolton to help with his pressure campaign to extract damaging information on Democrats from Ukrainian officials.”
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
Joshua A. Geltzer proslijedio/la je tweet
Ryan Goodman 31. sij
The quid pro quo is ongoing “Pompeo did not give Mr Zelensky one thing he has sought since last May...Pompeo’s message that Mr Trump was not ready to receive Mr Zelensky at the White House was a blow to the Ukrainian president’s national security efforts”
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
Joshua A. Geltzer 31. sij
Trump’s lawyers have held up Gouverneur Morris as the framer whose view most supports their view of what’s impeachable. Just 1 problem: Morris changed his mind on impeachment. A must-read by ’s amazing dean, Bill Treanor, in :
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
Joshua A. Geltzer 31. sij
Sen. Alexander: "The question then is not whether the president did it, but whether the United States Senate or the American people should decide what to do about what he did" Constitution: "The Senate shall have the sole Power to try all Impeachments" So not really a question!
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
Joshua A. Geltzer 31. sij
Trump’s lawyers: The House should’ve gone to court! Senator: Actually, the House went to court—let’s wait for the answer (again) after you guys lost & appealed, maybe? Trump’s lawyers: We can’t wait for the courts! We might appeal again!
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"