Twitter | Search | |
Jason Wilde
Instead of Jets, who still aren't starting him, would've been better off getting cut, signing with , sitting/learning QB.
Reply Retweet Like More
Romeo Wand 18 Dec 12
Replying to @jasonjwilde
Jason, as a Packers fan living in Chicago, I don't think I could survive the ridicule that would bring.
Reply Retweet Like
Ed Hannan 18 Dec 12
Replying to @jasonjwilde
were they interested in him?
Reply Retweet Like
Ross Bukouricz 18 Dec 12
Replying to @jasonjwilde
and they would have a better short yardage running game.
Reply Retweet Like
Romeo Wand 18 Dec 12
Replying to @jasonjwilde
especially given the crap I gave the Bears faithful for getting Tebow'd last season...
Reply Retweet Like
Marques Eversoll 18 Dec 12
Replying to @jasonjwilde
Exactly, said that from the beginning. And if there's anywhere "TebowMania" would be quiet, it's Green Bay.
Reply Retweet Like
MATT BOVE 18 Dec 12
Replying to @jasonjwilde
yeah but would the Packers be better off?
Reply Retweet Like
Eric 18 Dec 12
Replying to @jasonjwilde
I disagree. Tebow brings major distractions but no passing ability. Jax, maybe, as a sideshow to put butts in seats.
Reply Retweet Like
S_S 18 Dec 12
Replying to @jasonjwilde
and who knows, maybe he could kick FG's too!
Reply Retweet Like
Jason Wilde 18 Dec 12
Replying to @ejaygee
Packers are great at handling distractions though. I guarantee they wouldn't have let it become a circus. My opinion, anyway.
Reply Retweet Like
Brian Cooper 18 Dec 12
Replying to @jasonjwilde
Worst. Idea. Ever.
Reply Retweet Like
Sam Perkins 18 Dec 12
Replying to @jasonjwilde
valuable roster spot to a guy learning things he should've in HS? Good for Tebow, not Packers.
Reply Retweet Like
Eric 18 Dec 12
Replying to @jasonjwilde
Tebow was fine in college w/receivers running wide open, doesn't seem to have the release or accuracy for NFL QB. My opinion.
Reply Retweet Like
Derek 18 Dec 12
Replying to @jasonjwilde
Definitely would help the short yardage running game.
Reply Retweet Like
Jon Kjarsgaard 18 Dec 12
Replying to @jasonjwilde @ejaygee
Indeed. It's a lot easier to not have a circus when he's not playing behind Rodgers than not playing behind Sanchez.
Reply Retweet Like
TF/PackersCowboysFan 18 Dec 12
Replying to @jasonjwilde @TimTebow
I agree, would be a great fit in GB,learning behind and :)
Reply Retweet Like
Sven 20 Dec 12
Replying to @jasonjwilde @TimTebow
Great idea Jason and I hope the Packers seriously consider getting Tebow. Game planning problems, yah!
Reply Retweet Like