Twitter | Pretraživanje | |
Jake Orthwein
Writer, Filmmaker. Director of Media
717
Tweetovi
1.401
Pratim
231
Osobe koje vas prate
Tweetovi
Jake Orthwein proslijedio/la je tweet
Henri Prestes 2. velj
Wandering in desolate places.
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
Jake Orthwein 2. velj
Odgovor korisniku/ci @TheAnnaGat
All to avoid “the screaming vacuum of an isolated mind.”
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
Jake Orthwein 2. velj
Odgovor korisniku/ci @TheAnnaGat
This is true of art as well. Just learned that EH Gombrich got this view of art as problem-solving from Popper.
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
Jake Orthwein 31. sij
Art as problem-solving, from on the great Walter Murch:
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
Jake Orthwein 31. sij
Odgovor korisniku/ci @Meaningness
Are you doing a tantric move on rationality? 🤯
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
Jake Orthwein 30. sij
Odgovor korisniku/ci @HiNaryan
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
Jake Orthwein 29. sij
Odgovor korisniku/ci @Meaningness @RealtimeAI @LetterWiki
I'm thinking of it in relation to paragraphs like these, both from Deutsch. (But he may be misreading Kuhn here, and I may be overdrawing the analogy.) I have to get back to work, but will think harder about this before my next reply! Thanks for engaging.
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
Jake Orthwein 29. sij
Odgovor korisniku/ci @Meaningness @RealtimeAI
The analogy to Kegan I was driving at is that there are "problems" that seem to point more directly to the need for ontological restructuring. Unless an alternative is available, we tend to hold on to the prior paradigm -- and should, provided we don't deny there's a problem.
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
Jake Orthwein 29. sij
Odgovor korisniku/ci @RealtimeAI @Meaningness
Presumably there's something different about what was going on in Feynman's mind when playing plates than in the circus performer's (consciously or not). How was he handling theories? Can those methods be made explicit?
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
Jake Orthwein 29. sij
Odgovor korisniku/ci @RealtimeAI @Meaningness
Maybe there's not much of a conflict here. thinks there are relative, heuristic, fallible ways to arrive at good guesses. CR is largely agnostic about how the guesses get generated, but says that criticizing and (when necessary) replacing them leads to progress?
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
Jake Orthwein 29. sij
Odgovor korisniku/ci @Meaningness @RealtimeAI
May be helpful to disambiguate the Deutschian CR terms: Problem: Conflict between "theories" (including things like emotions, perceptions, and procedural knowledge). CR: Evolutionary process by which we solve problems. Variation (conjecture) and selection (criticism/refutation).
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
Jake Orthwein 29. sij
Odgovor korisniku/ci @RealtimeAI @Meaningness
But hard-to-varyness (the property of that makes explanations good) is only ever determined relative to a given parochial problem. Deutsch admits this, and that "theories" can be non-propositional, so the question is: how are we reliably implementing this?
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
Jake Orthwein 29. sij
Odgovor korisniku/ci @RealtimeAI @ArtirKel i 3 ostali
Give the people what they want
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
Jake Orthwein 29. sij
Odgovor korisniku/ci @Meaningness @RealtimeAI
This is very helpful! Is it from a forthcoming Eggplant chapter? This bit from Kegan does seem very Popperian, but I guess CR would have to explain how the conjecture and criticism processes are getting micro-implemented in everyday practical action.
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
Jake Orthwein 29. sij
Odgovor korisniku/ci @RealtimeAI @Meaningness
In Deutschian terms, Chapman is largely criticizing foundationalist/justificationist accounts of rationality. Doesn't generally help to read him as a critique of CR. I think if there's a critique of CR there, it's that it doesn't attend to how people actually reason in practice
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
Jake Orthwein 29. sij
Odgovor korisniku/ci @RealtimeAI @ArtirKel @Meaningness
not this! 😉
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
Jake Orthwein 29. sij
Kicking off my exchange with on metarationality. Eager to try to get a better handle on these ideas! Thanks for the nudge to give this a shot.
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
Jake Orthwein 28. sij
Odgovor korisniku/ci @_awbery_ @JaredJanes @danlistensto
As was yours!
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
Jake Orthwein 28. sij
Odgovor korisniku/ci @danlistensto @JaredJanes @_awbery_
👍let me know what you think!
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
Jake Orthwein 28. sij
Odgovor korisniku/ci @danlistensto @JaredJanes @_awbery_
On the contrary, this particular one talks about "reversing the stack," beginning with empty mind and working one's way back up?
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"