Twitter | Search | |
Jason Beale
Lengthy article dealing with present and past regarding everything from the origins of the FBI investigation, to Mueller, to Horowitz, Durham, and Barr. Not a single mention - not a word - of the Steele Dossier.
Reply Retweet Like More
Jason Beale 24 Oct 19
Replying to @jabeale
There's a lot going on in this section:
Reply Retweet Like
MaryEM 24 Oct 19
Replying to @jabeale @nytimes
Can’t have one without the other.
Reply Retweet Like
James Hicks πŸš’πŸš‘πŸ‘¨β€πŸš’ Same on Parler 24 Oct 19
Replying to @jabeale @nytimes
Jason, what ever happened with the case of the Russian company who came to face the charges? I think their name was Continental Catering or something like that. I noticed they mentioned the Russian indictments.
Reply Retweet Like
shipwreckedcrew 24 Oct 19
They are beating the hell out of the USAO in the District of Columbia, and that office goes to sleep every night cursing the SC for closing up ship and leaving them with that case. I think it will eventually get dismissed.
Reply Retweet Like
πƒπšπ§ 𝐆𝐨π₯𝐝𝐰𝐚𝐬𝐬𝐞𝐫 24 Oct 19
Journalisms!
Reply Retweet Like
Shem Horne 24 Oct 19
Replying to @jabeale @nytimes
Good catch
Reply Retweet Like
Ezekiel 24 Oct 19
They've been holding the bulk of this article for a while and chose today to release it. Maybe now we're gonna see some progress.
Reply Retweet Like
TC Loughery πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡Έ 24 Oct 19
The is literally going to have to go back to the beginning & explain to it’s readers what the Steele dossier is & how it was (mis)used. I bet there are people out there who have no idea what it is.
Reply Retweet Like
A Close Associate of Putin 25 Oct 19
They think Trump came up with this scheme last week to deflect attention. Will never occur to them to question why they never heard a peep about it from their news sources.
Reply Retweet Like
Winning! ⭐⭐⭐ 24 Oct 19
Replying to @jabeale @nytimes
Good timing for the WH to cancel its subscription!
Reply Retweet Like