|
@ibphillips | |||||
|
Impressive stuff. But from a quick look it seems they only deal with "volitional motor report" as a confound not other cognitive processes. So @De_dicto will rightly complain we need a no cognition paradigm.
|
||||||
|
||||||
|
Michael Cohen
@m_the_cohen
|
29. sij |
|
VERY important paper from Logothetis' group just posted on @biorxivpreprint about decoding consciousness in PFC in monkeys during a no-report paradigm. VERY critical data for current debates in awareness.
biorxiv.org/content/10.110…
|
||
|
|
||
|
Michael Cohen
@m_the_cohen
|
29. sij |
|
@De_dicto will in fact likely make that point, and it's certainly not unreasonable in my mind. Though I just don't know if we can ever generalize no cognition papers more broadly to different paradigms
|
||
|
|
||
|
hakwan lau
@hakwanlau
|
29. sij |
|
Ian, "rightly", really? how about this?
nature.com/articles/natur…
there the animal was attending to another feature, performing at near threshold (meaning it was challenging), yet the irrelevant feature could be decoded just as well.
we already discussed this in Odegaard et al
|
||
|
|
||
|
Victor Lamme
@VictorLamme
|
30. sij |
|
And, no surprise, so will I (argue that the stimuli still evoke cognition, or at least draw attention), which is particularly worrisome because what is decoded here are directions of motion that evoke strong OKN and recordings are made quite close to FEF and attention area DLPFC
|
||
|
|
||