Twitter | Pretraživanje | |
Katherine Ye
Making computing a more expressive material.
824
Tweetovi
435
Pratim
3.187
Osobe koje vas prate
Tweetovi
Katherine Ye proslijedio/la je tweet
Taís Oliveira 28. sij
Na próxima semana vai rolar um evento bem interessante no IEA/USP sobre tecnologias e seus variados impactos. Na quinta (6), em sessão gratuita e aberta, divido mesa com o pessoal do GECID, Dalida Benfield e . Mais infos:
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
Katherine Ye proslijedio/la je tweet
Jennifer Lee 23. sij
I'll be co-leading this workshop with next week! Come join us for countersurveillance yoga!
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
Katherine Ye 9. sij
Odgovor korisniku/ci @hypotext
Interested in the approach to pedagogy, so looking for something along the lines of the exercises in "Our Data Bodies" or "People's Guide to AI" but for computer vision.
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
Katherine Ye 9. sij
Can folks suggest good resources for explaining "how computer vision works 101" or "how facial recognition works 101" to a general audience?
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
Katherine Ye proslijedio/la je tweet
The Strange 7. sij
〰️🌱𝒩𝐸𝒲𝒮🌱〰️ We're now taking applications for the Spring 2020 Decelerator residency. 🌷 🌎This season we're supporting creative practitioners who champion and protect our irreplaceable earth.🌎 Applications due Feb 6 // Learn more + apply⟶
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
Katherine Ye 1. sij
❄️festive PSA❄️ we're nowhere near done having hard conversations about one of the defining events of 2019: how the fallout from the Jeffrey Epstein sex trafficking scandal implicates large swaths of the American techno-counterculture ❄️it's not over❄️
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
Katherine Ye 22. pro
Odgovor korisniku/ci @fredbenenson @gleemie
And to focus on the structural forces at work in shaping the discourse around "ethics in AI."
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
Katherine Ye 22. pro
Odgovor korisniku/ci @fredbenenson @gleemie
Lots of complicated conversations happening now around this piece. I want to second 's call to center grassroots orgs that are led by the folks who are most affected by algorithmic injustice—as the writer does!
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
Katherine Ye proslijedio/la je tweet
Lilly Irani 22. pro
So what it missing? And does it change the argument the corporations prefer ethics based regulation to banning certain technologies and fund academia to strengthen their case?
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
Katherine Ye 21. pro
Odgovor korisniku/ci @ohnobackspace
On second thought, Twitter may not be the best place to continue this convo. Maybe via email?
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
Katherine Ye 21. pro
Odgovor korisniku/ci @fredbenenson
A friend in the FAT* community adds that they think the piece flattens complex issues around incrementalism vs reform in the field, but that it's hard to have a public conversation about the field's struggles with power, because it requires disclosing even more insider knowledge.
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
Katherine Ye 21. pro
Odgovor korisniku/ci @fredbenenson
Seconding 's point that this is a complicated take, and to center voices from folks with other lived experiences in the conversation.
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
Katherine Ye 21. pro
Odgovor korisniku/ci @rg9119
I boosted this piece because it rings true with my + friends' experiences in CS academia & bc it starts an important conversation about influence + ideas. But I think it's important to note the tension b/t the author's intent with the piece and the impact it may actually have.
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
Katherine Ye 21. pro
Odgovor korisniku/ci @rg9119
Important note (via ):
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
Katherine Ye 21. pro
Odgovor korisniku/ci @rg9119 @theintercept @fredbenenson
Thanks for adding this perspective. may I add your tweets to the thread?
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
Katherine Ye 21. pro
Odgovor korisniku/ci @ohnobackspace
Yes! May I RT?
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
Katherine Ye 20. pro
Odgovor korisniku/ci @hypotext
For more, check out their paper "Beyond Legitimation: Rethinking Fairness, Interpretability, and Accuracy in Machine Learning": 12/
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
Katherine Ye 20. pro
Odgovor korisniku/ci @hypotext
Finally: this is not new! In the 1970s and 80s, the US private insurance industry invented the idea of "actuarial fairness" to protect itself from charges of discrimination by activists and evade legal regulation, as Ochigame et al. have written earlier. Sound familiar? 11/
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
Katherine Ye 20. pro
Odgovor korisniku/ci @hypotext
This piece is a great counterpoint to the argument of technological determinism: "If we don't build it, someone else will." Perhaps interrogate who planted the thought that "it," whatever technology, was worth building in the first place? 10/
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
Katherine Ye 20. pro
Odgovor korisniku/ci @hypotext
Do you care about how corporate profit agendas shape the research, policymaking, and national conversations around the software that governs your life and that is deployed against enemies of the state? Read this piece. 9/
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"