Twitter | Search | |
๐“—๐“พ๐“ด๐“พ๐“ถ ๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ณ
The AIM-120 C was fired by one of the 4 x F-16 flying CAP in the general area of Mangla Dam (POK).This was aimed at 4x Su-30MKI which was vectored towards Sunderbani to deter any attempts to target Udhampur AFS.
Reply Retweet Like More
๐“—๐“พ๐“ด๐“พ๐“ถ ๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ณ 3 Mar 19
Replying to @hukum2082
The Su-30 MKI which was "locked on" by the F-16 , quickly punched counter measures on being warned by the onboard Tarang RWR.The AIM-120 C lost lock and went onto slam into Reasi.
Reply Retweet Like
The Wolfpack๐Ÿ”Ž 3 Mar 19
Replying to @hukum2082
It was deflected by chaff and jammers
Reply Retweet Like
Battlecruiser Stan ๐Ÿ‡ฌ๐Ÿ‡ง๐Ÿด๓ ง๓ ข๓ ณ๓ ฃ๓ ด๓ ฟ 4 Mar 19
Replying to @hukum2082
Eh, Got a source or ten for those squiggly lines and timestamps?
Reply Retweet Like
๐“—๐“พ๐“ด๐“พ๐“ถ ๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ณ 6 Mar 19
Replying to @Chopsyturvey
Reply Retweet Like
Rajeev 3 Mar 19
Replying to @hukum2082
Does RoE allow PAF to target aircrafts on Indian side even when they haven't crossed the LoC, what did IAF didn't respond in kind?
Reply Retweet Like
๐“—๐“พ๐“ด๐“พ๐“ถ ๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ณ 3 Mar 19
Replying to @rajeev0781
The PAF does not follow ROE in any form.
Reply Retweet Like
A Nationalist 3 Mar 19
Replying to @hukum2082
The only question in my mind is what were our SU 30 MKIs doing. It can track 15 targets and can engage with 4 at a time, with 12 hard points and enemy radar jamming only 2 MKIs should have enough for the Paki formation that attacked at 1000 hours
Reply Retweet Like
Anshuman Mainkar 5 Mar 19
Replying to @Peacef_Warrior
BVR combat is a tad dicey, especially in the hills. The game deteriorated very fast into WVR, where the big numbers donโ€™t matter. Hence โ€™s heroics with the R73.
Reply Retweet Like
Abhishek Dantale 5 Mar 19
Firing across the LoC at a PAF aircraft could be seen as an act of war. So, no action was taken. The one F16 that entered our territory which was shot down.
Reply Retweet Like