Twitter | Search | |
This is the legacy version of twitter.com. We will be shutting it down on 15 December 2020. Please switch to a supported browser or device. You can see a list of supported browsers in our Help Center.
Damian Thompson 3 Jul 18
These claims are indeed disturbing. The Vatican must respond.
Reply Retweet Like
Damian Thompson
What’s extraordinary is that these claims that Francis protected a paedophile priest - which may well be false - were aired *in detail* five years ago. Why were they not addressed then?
Reply Retweet Like More
Damian Thompson 3 Jul 18
Replying to @holysmoke
I have made some enquiries. The credibility of the story has not - yet - been challenged. The media just aren’t interested.
Reply Retweet Like
Damian Thompson 3 Jul 18
Replying to @holysmoke
Seems to me that abuse allegations from Argentina and Chile are routinely kicked into the long grass. It is very odd.
Reply Retweet Like
Paul Vallely 3 Jul 18
Replying to @holysmoke
See the 2015 edition of my book.
Reply Retweet Like
Damian Thompson 3 Jul 18
Replying to @pvall
No mention of this case in it. What do you make of the claims?
Reply Retweet Like